![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't get it. Why are they dubious? Kingturtle 02:42 Apr 17, 2003 (UTC)
Many of the dubious Danish kings, are history, but the date of living and reign and place, are unknown.
Any do know the start of reign of Canute the Great by Denmark. 1014 and 1018 are both possible.
Haabet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haabet ( talk • contribs) 21:35, 27 April 2003 (UTC)
They are already on the well known list, as the Jelling dynasty. 24.255.40.174 15:37, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
do you have a link to this "well known list"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haabet ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 8 November 2004 (UTC)
List of Danish monarchs. Anyways, it goes from Gorm the Old to Harthacanute. 24.255.40.174 11:31, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Where came this list from? Haabet 18:47, 2004 Nov 10 (UTC)
Civil war 812-814 five kings
I didn't put it there Haab, it's actually quite pitiful. I don't know, sorry. 24.255.40.174 04:12, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Could someone please provide a reference for Angantyr's death on Samsö? It sounds much like Angantyr being killed by Hjalmar on Samsö.-- Wiglaf 15:51, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Correctly. The history about the dead of Angantyr have many variants by growing number of Angantyrs brothers, but all speak about a Island or Samsoe. The archaeologists know the war on Samsoe in 728 and a english source say as the danish king was Angantyr about that time. 217.157.164.52 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) Haabet 22:28, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
The tradition says Angantyr and his brothers dead on Samsoe. Any tradition says direct as Angantyr was a king, but in Saxo the context say as the dane get a new king after the dead of Angantyr. The dead of his brothers remove candidate for the throne. Haabet 06:22, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
In periodical Skalk had write the same. But this is a list of dubious Danish kings. And St. Willibrord is a fine sources of that time. Haabet 07:02, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
No, king Ongendus was named of Anganty. And Saxo is not a new source on Tyrfing cycle. Haabet 10:25, 2005 Apr 30 (UTC)
Saxo had mix two Angantyr. One had home i dubious Danish kings, another Angantyr had home i Tyrfing cycle, but the tradition had mix them together. If a historical person had a name from a legend the tradition will mix the historical person and the legend person together. Both Angantyr and his killer Helge was danish king. Helge been danish becorses Angantyr was death on Samsoe. Angantyr been also kill of Starkad as Helge been danish king. Can you accept a compromise as Angantyr both was a dubious Danish king and a part Tyrfing cycle? Haabet 23:08, 2005 May 1 (UTC)
if the Danish article corresponding to this is "Sagnkonger", its title should be legendary Danish kings, or, if there are disputes, possibly legendary Danish kings. But not "dubious kings", that sounds ridiculous. Compare also the solution on King of the Britons. dab (ᛏ) 17:49, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
All legendary Danish kings is in "Saxos prehistoric list of kings". Many several times. Can you make a title to that list?
all king before Gorm the English or later was king of danes, perhaps not Danish kings. Complexed and confused. What is correctly? Haabet 20:18, 2005 May 8 (UTC)
What does the abbreviation "o." mean when giving the dates here? Bobbis 6 July 2005 11:15 (UTC)
Impressive work - and very useful! Many thanks from some "hovnarrar" in Norway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.167.125.181 ( talk) 03:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe Scealdwea is the same as Scyld.-- 67.187.177.243 ( talk) 02:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Why does Wikipedia use latinized names for indivuduals who themselved didn't speak it, and may never have even heard it? 69.158.124.203 ( talk) 12:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Carewolf changed this
to
The new form says to me that either Sigtrygg was deposed by Harthacnut or Sigtrygg was contemporary – with Harthacnut, I guess, which he'd have to be if one deposed the other.
Should it perhaps be Sigtrygg Gnupasson, deposed c. 916, perhaps by Harthacnut? —Tamfang ( talk) 04:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't get it. Why are they dubious? Kingturtle 02:42 Apr 17, 2003 (UTC)
Many of the dubious Danish kings, are history, but the date of living and reign and place, are unknown.
Any do know the start of reign of Canute the Great by Denmark. 1014 and 1018 are both possible.
Haabet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haabet ( talk • contribs) 21:35, 27 April 2003 (UTC)
They are already on the well known list, as the Jelling dynasty. 24.255.40.174 15:37, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
do you have a link to this "well known list"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haabet ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 8 November 2004 (UTC)
List of Danish monarchs. Anyways, it goes from Gorm the Old to Harthacanute. 24.255.40.174 11:31, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Where came this list from? Haabet 18:47, 2004 Nov 10 (UTC)
Civil war 812-814 five kings
I didn't put it there Haab, it's actually quite pitiful. I don't know, sorry. 24.255.40.174 04:12, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Could someone please provide a reference for Angantyr's death on Samsö? It sounds much like Angantyr being killed by Hjalmar on Samsö.-- Wiglaf 15:51, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Correctly. The history about the dead of Angantyr have many variants by growing number of Angantyrs brothers, but all speak about a Island or Samsoe. The archaeologists know the war on Samsoe in 728 and a english source say as the danish king was Angantyr about that time. 217.157.164.52 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) Haabet 22:28, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
The tradition says Angantyr and his brothers dead on Samsoe. Any tradition says direct as Angantyr was a king, but in Saxo the context say as the dane get a new king after the dead of Angantyr. The dead of his brothers remove candidate for the throne. Haabet 06:22, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
In periodical Skalk had write the same. But this is a list of dubious Danish kings. And St. Willibrord is a fine sources of that time. Haabet 07:02, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
No, king Ongendus was named of Anganty. And Saxo is not a new source on Tyrfing cycle. Haabet 10:25, 2005 Apr 30 (UTC)
Saxo had mix two Angantyr. One had home i dubious Danish kings, another Angantyr had home i Tyrfing cycle, but the tradition had mix them together. If a historical person had a name from a legend the tradition will mix the historical person and the legend person together. Both Angantyr and his killer Helge was danish king. Helge been danish becorses Angantyr was death on Samsoe. Angantyr been also kill of Starkad as Helge been danish king. Can you accept a compromise as Angantyr both was a dubious Danish king and a part Tyrfing cycle? Haabet 23:08, 2005 May 1 (UTC)
if the Danish article corresponding to this is "Sagnkonger", its title should be legendary Danish kings, or, if there are disputes, possibly legendary Danish kings. But not "dubious kings", that sounds ridiculous. Compare also the solution on King of the Britons. dab (ᛏ) 17:49, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
All legendary Danish kings is in "Saxos prehistoric list of kings". Many several times. Can you make a title to that list?
all king before Gorm the English or later was king of danes, perhaps not Danish kings. Complexed and confused. What is correctly? Haabet 20:18, 2005 May 8 (UTC)
What does the abbreviation "o." mean when giving the dates here? Bobbis 6 July 2005 11:15 (UTC)
Impressive work - and very useful! Many thanks from some "hovnarrar" in Norway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.167.125.181 ( talk) 03:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe Scealdwea is the same as Scyld.-- 67.187.177.243 ( talk) 02:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Why does Wikipedia use latinized names for indivuduals who themselved didn't speak it, and may never have even heard it? 69.158.124.203 ( talk) 12:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Carewolf changed this
to
The new form says to me that either Sigtrygg was deposed by Harthacnut or Sigtrygg was contemporary – with Harthacnut, I guess, which he'd have to be if one deposed the other.
Should it perhaps be Sigtrygg Gnupasson, deposed c. 916, perhaps by Harthacnut? —Tamfang ( talk) 04:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)