![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, -- Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
List class articles cannot be nominated for GA status. They may either be nominated as featured lists at WP:FAC or as A-Class articles at project level. Please see WP:Good article criteria#What is not a good article? I have removed the nomination. –– Jezhotwells ( talk) 14:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
See here - does the Holy See has a mission/accreditation to SMOM? Alinor ( talk) 16:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Copied from Esoglou talk page:
I noticed you have been quite a prolific contributor to Wikipedia, and have just discovered this article
You recently made a number of changes in good faith to the article List of diplomatic missions of the Holy See, including listing resident and non-resident representations, and adding a second map. This and other Diplomatic Missions by Country (DMBC) articles were written and compiled to focus on diplomatic missions (ie: a physical presence), and not non-resident accreditations, honorary consulates and other details.
You may not have noticed that we have over 180 articles listing the diplomatic missions of every country in the world. Since 2006 these articles have followed a consistent format, and we rigorously stick to standards about what is included, and how it is included. The changes you have proposed do not fit with either the purpose or style of these articles, and I have reverted the article back.
If you have a compelling reason why we should modify a longstanding policies on the style and content of over 180 articles, this would need to be discussed with other editors.
However what you have written is still worth including on Wikipedia. You might wish to take the suggestion I provided to you earier and create an article to list all the nuncios (ambassadors), like List of Ambassadors from Ethiopia or List of ambassadors from South Korea. You could also write biographies of the nuncios, since I notice very few have articles - you seem to have contributed many articles on religious matters, and your knowledge and passion could be best placed contributing on writing the bios of nuncios.
Kransky ( talk) 12:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Embassy of Vatican in Albania 1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
|
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC) |
User:XLR8TION thinks Turkey should be listed under Europe because of being a member of the Council of Europe and NATO (and, one could add, having ambitions to become a member of the European Union). I think that those considerations do not outweigh the geographical fact that by far the greater part of Turkey, including its capital, is in Asia, any more than Israel's membership of some European organizations outweighs the geographical fact of where the whole of Israel is situated. This article has a geographical section headed "Middle East" (excluding Egypt and so corresponding to what is also called "West Asia"). I think that is the most suitable heading under which to place Turkey. Esoglou ( talk) 13:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Turkey is a member of the Council of Europe, NATO, and is a candidate for membership into the European Union. They are technically part of Europe. Please do not involve the Armenian Genocide in this as the UN never said that Turkey was a part of Asia and Armenia is part of Europe also as they are part of the Council of Europe. Religion does not play a role in determining a country's location. Georgraphy and membership in regional organizations does. -- XLR8TION ( talk) 14:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
It’s an oddity that the Holy See has a nuncio accredited to Great Britain rather than the UK. What do we do for a flag icon? Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 22:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, -- Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
List class articles cannot be nominated for GA status. They may either be nominated as featured lists at WP:FAC or as A-Class articles at project level. Please see WP:Good article criteria#What is not a good article? I have removed the nomination. –– Jezhotwells ( talk) 14:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
See here - does the Holy See has a mission/accreditation to SMOM? Alinor ( talk) 16:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Copied from Esoglou talk page:
I noticed you have been quite a prolific contributor to Wikipedia, and have just discovered this article
You recently made a number of changes in good faith to the article List of diplomatic missions of the Holy See, including listing resident and non-resident representations, and adding a second map. This and other Diplomatic Missions by Country (DMBC) articles were written and compiled to focus on diplomatic missions (ie: a physical presence), and not non-resident accreditations, honorary consulates and other details.
You may not have noticed that we have over 180 articles listing the diplomatic missions of every country in the world. Since 2006 these articles have followed a consistent format, and we rigorously stick to standards about what is included, and how it is included. The changes you have proposed do not fit with either the purpose or style of these articles, and I have reverted the article back.
If you have a compelling reason why we should modify a longstanding policies on the style and content of over 180 articles, this would need to be discussed with other editors.
However what you have written is still worth including on Wikipedia. You might wish to take the suggestion I provided to you earier and create an article to list all the nuncios (ambassadors), like List of Ambassadors from Ethiopia or List of ambassadors from South Korea. You could also write biographies of the nuncios, since I notice very few have articles - you seem to have contributed many articles on religious matters, and your knowledge and passion could be best placed contributing on writing the bios of nuncios.
Kransky ( talk) 12:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Embassy of Vatican in Albania 1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
|
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC) |
User:XLR8TION thinks Turkey should be listed under Europe because of being a member of the Council of Europe and NATO (and, one could add, having ambitions to become a member of the European Union). I think that those considerations do not outweigh the geographical fact that by far the greater part of Turkey, including its capital, is in Asia, any more than Israel's membership of some European organizations outweighs the geographical fact of where the whole of Israel is situated. This article has a geographical section headed "Middle East" (excluding Egypt and so corresponding to what is also called "West Asia"). I think that is the most suitable heading under which to place Turkey. Esoglou ( talk) 13:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Turkey is a member of the Council of Europe, NATO, and is a candidate for membership into the European Union. They are technically part of Europe. Please do not involve the Armenian Genocide in this as the UN never said that Turkey was a part of Asia and Armenia is part of Europe also as they are part of the Council of Europe. Religion does not play a role in determining a country's location. Georgraphy and membership in regional organizations does. -- XLR8TION ( talk) 14:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
It’s an oddity that the Holy See has a nuncio accredited to Great Britain rather than the UK. What do we do for a flag icon? Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 22:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)