This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article adds the size of SWFs within each country together, unlike the SWF article that just lists all the SWFs around the world. I say it should stay.
129.241.124.127 (
talk)
12:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)reply
But both lists are a mess and inconsistent. Are individual US state retirement funds "sovereign wealth funds"? I don't really think so. They're funded from employee compensation and obligated for retirement only like any pension. But if so, it's missing NYSLRS and NYSTRS which together have something north of $300 billion just for those. And that's just off the top of my head. Also, I think both lists would benefit much by having columns with assets/capita and assets/citizen, which give a better sense of proportion. That really changes the numbers, e.g. China is #1 on this list but has about $1 per capita and per citizen. UAE is close behind China but has $141,000 per capita and $928,000 per citizen, Norway is #3 and has $190,000 per capita, $226,000 per citizen, Singapore is #5 and has $99,000 per capita, $163,000 per citizen. Small states with large migrant/expat populations are in a very different position.
NTK (
talk)
05:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article adds the size of SWFs within each country together, unlike the SWF article that just lists all the SWFs around the world. I say it should stay.
129.241.124.127 (
talk)
12:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)reply
But both lists are a mess and inconsistent. Are individual US state retirement funds "sovereign wealth funds"? I don't really think so. They're funded from employee compensation and obligated for retirement only like any pension. But if so, it's missing NYSLRS and NYSTRS which together have something north of $300 billion just for those. And that's just off the top of my head. Also, I think both lists would benefit much by having columns with assets/capita and assets/citizen, which give a better sense of proportion. That really changes the numbers, e.g. China is #1 on this list but has about $1 per capita and per citizen. UAE is close behind China but has $141,000 per capita and $928,000 per citizen, Norway is #3 and has $190,000 per capita, $226,000 per citizen, Singapore is #5 and has $99,000 per capita, $163,000 per citizen. Small states with large migrant/expat populations are in a very different position.
NTK (
talk)
05:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)reply