This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This list has a strong overlap with the list found in the article
consumer organization. The latter article is little more than a list of consumer organizations, with some info about the history and purpose of such organizations, and also a list of consumer magazines. I don't have a strong preference as to whether that list should be moved here, or this list should be integrated there, but it's clear these texts are largely duplicates.
Nederlandse Leeuw (
talk) 15:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Not sure.@
Nederlandse Leeuw: I feel that many users dislike expanding list articles with readable text. It is easy for me to agree to merge the two lists into one article. At the same time, I think that "consumer organization" could stand as its own article.
At the same time it is difficult to access much information about the concept of a consumer organization. The text on this concept is mostly in paper books and not easy to access through digital publications. I think that we could have a short Wikipedia article called "consumer organization" which cites maybe 5 paper books or behind-the-paywall journals, and maybe it could be 10 sentences long. Beyond that there is a barrier to expanding such an article. Some Wiki editors say that a short article like that should be at the top of a long and messy list. I prefer to not put lists in front of typical readers who are not asking to see a list article. If there is a merge I suppose that "list of consumer organizations" is best. Thoughts from anyone else?
Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Closing, given the opposition, no real support, and discussion stale for more than a year.
Klbrain (
talk) 20:41, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This list has a strong overlap with the list found in the article
consumer organization. The latter article is little more than a list of consumer organizations, with some info about the history and purpose of such organizations, and also a list of consumer magazines. I don't have a strong preference as to whether that list should be moved here, or this list should be integrated there, but it's clear these texts are largely duplicates.
Nederlandse Leeuw (
talk) 15:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Not sure.@
Nederlandse Leeuw: I feel that many users dislike expanding list articles with readable text. It is easy for me to agree to merge the two lists into one article. At the same time, I think that "consumer organization" could stand as its own article.
At the same time it is difficult to access much information about the concept of a consumer organization. The text on this concept is mostly in paper books and not easy to access through digital publications. I think that we could have a short Wikipedia article called "consumer organization" which cites maybe 5 paper books or behind-the-paywall journals, and maybe it could be 10 sentences long. Beyond that there is a barrier to expanding such an article. Some Wiki editors say that a short article like that should be at the top of a long and messy list. I prefer to not put lists in front of typical readers who are not asking to see a list article. If there is a merge I suppose that "list of consumer organizations" is best. Thoughts from anyone else?
Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Closing, given the opposition, no real support, and discussion stale for more than a year.
Klbrain (
talk) 20:41, 14 July 2019 (UTC)reply
