This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
What's the scope here? What should the scope be, as to make the best article?
I think this should be changed to 'household cleaning products'. That is a better fit to the expectations of our likely readership - although I would include "DIY" and hobby cleaners (even if originally industrial), such as
Swarfega.
The problem at present is that it lists fairly benign retail cleaners like
Shake n' Vac alongside horrible lab chemistry like
piranha solution. I won't use piranha mixtures, that's what disposable lab assistants are for. We shouldn't be discussing that (or similar cleaners) in the same scope as jars from the supermarket.
Andy Dingley (
talk)
13:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
What's the scope here? What should the scope be, as to make the best article?
I think this should be changed to 'household cleaning products'. That is a better fit to the expectations of our likely readership - although I would include "DIY" and hobby cleaners (even if originally industrial), such as
Swarfega.
The problem at present is that it lists fairly benign retail cleaners like
Shake n' Vac alongside horrible lab chemistry like
piranha solution. I won't use piranha mixtures, that's what disposable lab assistants are for. We shouldn't be discussing that (or similar cleaners) in the same scope as jars from the supermarket.
Andy Dingley (
talk)
13:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)reply