This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since this big is not so big, wouldn't it be a good idea to merge it with layout engine? I'm not bold enough to do it without consent. Pilaf 17:28, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Apparently it's a sort of mini HTML control thingy, but I don't know much about it, other than that it is it's own stand-alone layout engine. No word on standards support, CSS support, ... I don't know - I was hoping to find that out here. Shinobu 04:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Peregrine, Kestrel and Merlin are not Opera rendering engines. They are code names for upcoming desktop versions, all based on the Presto rendering engine.
BlackBerry are claiming full CSS2.1 support with their latest version: [1]. That's probably worth adding? Robin ( talk) 16:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since this big is not so big, wouldn't it be a good idea to merge it with layout engine? I'm not bold enough to do it without consent. Pilaf 17:28, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Apparently it's a sort of mini HTML control thingy, but I don't know much about it, other than that it is it's own stand-alone layout engine. No word on standards support, CSS support, ... I don't know - I was hoping to find that out here. Shinobu 04:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Peregrine, Kestrel and Merlin are not Opera rendering engines. They are code names for upcoming desktop versions, all based on the Presto rendering engine.
BlackBerry are claiming full CSS2.1 support with their latest version: [1]. That's probably worth adding? Robin ( talk) 16:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)