This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bibliographies: Science Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Science Taskforce (assessed as Mid-importance). Physics: Publications Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Publications Taskforce. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

There is already a List of important publications in physics. To better distinguish between that and this one, I am going to rename it to Bibliography of popular physics books. RockMagnetist ( talk) 23:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I see it was renamed to Bibliography of popular physics concepts. I can see the rationale - belatedly, I realize that Bibliography of popular physics books is redundant - but I'm not sure if there is any such thing as a "popular physics concept". The defining feature of a popular physics book is not the collection of concepts but how they are presented. How about Bibliography of popular physics? RockMagnetist ( talk) 22:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC) reply