 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page does include a number of other existing pages, PDBWiki, NeuroLex, MetaBase, SNPedia and others. Not a valid reason for deletion. Biophys ( talk) 16:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Not too many publications ... [1]. Biophys ( talk) 19:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
How to best 'syndicate' this list?
Cheers, -- Dan| (talk) 12:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- We need to provide some text about biological wikis, with references to publications about individual wikis and the subject in general per WP:RS and to show notability of the subject. It's fine to provide link to the conference. My personal opinion: only a few biological wikis are sustainable (I like that one which is based on the active student participation model), which brings people to wikipedia as the only centralized resource. Biophys ( talk) 14:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page does include a number of other existing pages, PDBWiki, NeuroLex, MetaBase, SNPedia and others. Not a valid reason for deletion. Biophys ( talk) 16:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Not too many publications ... [1]. Biophys ( talk) 19:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
How to best 'syndicate' this list?
Cheers, -- Dan| (talk) 12:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- We need to provide some text about biological wikis, with references to publications about individual wikis and the subject in general per WP:RS and to show notability of the subject. It's fine to provide link to the conference. My personal opinion: only a few biological wikis are sustainable (I like that one which is based on the active student participation model), which brings people to wikipedia as the only centralized resource. Biophys ( talk) 14:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)