From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OPS

Is there a List of OPS satellites? (presumably under some other name, since this is a redlink) 70.29.208.247 ( talk) 01:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Delinking USA names in favor of redirects

Should the designations numbers (which are almost all red links) be redirected to their more commonly used alternate names and the links removed? My guess is that the USA-xxx designation names are notable enough for a redirect, but I don't see any reason for separate articles. TStein ( talk) 19:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC) reply

  • Under current practices, those articles would be considered notable, but it is unlikely that they will be created in the near future. My suggestion would be to create redirects, but leave the links in place, and pointing to the redirect pages; the redirects can always be replaced with articles in due course without needing to edit the list in the meantime. -- G W 09:13, 13 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Requested move 4 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. Cúchullain t/ c 13:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC) reply



List of USA satellitesList of USA-designation satellites – I feel that the current title is somewhat confusing as it could be interpreted at first glance to provide a comprehensive list of satellites launched by the United States, though it is most certainly not that. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 03:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC) reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of USA satellites. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply


NSSF satellites

Is there no similar list with NSSF dedicated satellites? 194.102.58.14 ( talk) 13:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

USA-41 as COBRA BRASS?

According to an article hosted by FAS, launch of a COBRA BRASS satellite was "scheduled for this year" in 1998. USA-41 is listed by this page as COBRA BRASS and decaying in 1989. A Colorado State list gives USA-40 and USA-41 as military communications satellites. Is anyone aware of the sourcing for the claim that USA-41 was a COBRA BRASS satellite?

Links referenced above: https://irp.fas.org/news/1998/08/MASINT.htm https://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/dev/hillger/usa.htm

mmfcl, Godstar23 ( talk) 17:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OPS

Is there a List of OPS satellites? (presumably under some other name, since this is a redlink) 70.29.208.247 ( talk) 01:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Delinking USA names in favor of redirects

Should the designations numbers (which are almost all red links) be redirected to their more commonly used alternate names and the links removed? My guess is that the USA-xxx designation names are notable enough for a redirect, but I don't see any reason for separate articles. TStein ( talk) 19:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC) reply

  • Under current practices, those articles would be considered notable, but it is unlikely that they will be created in the near future. My suggestion would be to create redirects, but leave the links in place, and pointing to the redirect pages; the redirects can always be replaced with articles in due course without needing to edit the list in the meantime. -- G W 09:13, 13 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Requested move 4 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. Cúchullain t/ c 13:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC) reply



List of USA satellitesList of USA-designation satellites – I feel that the current title is somewhat confusing as it could be interpreted at first glance to provide a comprehensive list of satellites launched by the United States, though it is most certainly not that. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 03:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC) reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of USA satellites. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply


NSSF satellites

Is there no similar list with NSSF dedicated satellites? 194.102.58.14 ( talk) 13:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

USA-41 as COBRA BRASS?

According to an article hosted by FAS, launch of a COBRA BRASS satellite was "scheduled for this year" in 1998. USA-41 is listed by this page as COBRA BRASS and decaying in 1989. A Colorado State list gives USA-40 and USA-41 as military communications satellites. Is anyone aware of the sourcing for the claim that USA-41 was a COBRA BRASS satellite?

Links referenced above: https://irp.fas.org/news/1998/08/MASINT.htm https://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/dev/hillger/usa.htm

mmfcl, Godstar23 ( talk) 17:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook