![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
can someone please clear up if Tanner is working for the same law firm when he moves to NYC. Or if he joined a new firm in NYC. Thanks 199.246.39.222 ( talk) 22:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Any objections to making separate articles for them. I will also post this on the Suits talk page.
Makes sense to me, too. Also, is it just me, or does anyone else feel that Mike's innocence and vulnerability are what made him—and consequently, the whole show—interesting? And that as it progressed, and he became tougher, more jaded, and generally more like all the other lawyers, his character became flat, and the whole show devolved into a soapy merry-go-round of manufactured conflicts? That's certainly the impression I've gotten, watching it over the last few weeks. (To be fair, its creators couldn't have imagined all the episodes would eventually be available at once. Spaced out week-to-week, the change must not have been so obvious. Still, I don't envy them, having to keep such a thing chugging along, season after season, after it'd lost most of its meaning.) Once "Mike" has his own page, do you think it'd be appropriate to add a note about this transition and its effect on the show's quality? It could be of interest to aspiring TV writers—i.e., if you have a central character who's not a self-serving jerk like all the rest, don't turn him into one too, y'know? Just saying. – AndyFielding ( talk) 23:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
can someone please clear up if Tanner is working for the same law firm when he moves to NYC. Or if he joined a new firm in NYC. Thanks 199.246.39.222 ( talk) 22:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Any objections to making separate articles for them. I will also post this on the Suits talk page.
Makes sense to me, too. Also, is it just me, or does anyone else feel that Mike's innocence and vulnerability are what made him—and consequently, the whole show—interesting? And that as it progressed, and he became tougher, more jaded, and generally more like all the other lawyers, his character became flat, and the whole show devolved into a soapy merry-go-round of manufactured conflicts? That's certainly the impression I've gotten, watching it over the last few weeks. (To be fair, its creators couldn't have imagined all the episodes would eventually be available at once. Spaced out week-to-week, the change must not have been so obvious. Still, I don't envy them, having to keep such a thing chugging along, season after season, after it'd lost most of its meaning.) Once "Mike" has his own page, do you think it'd be appropriate to add a note about this transition and its effect on the show's quality? It could be of interest to aspiring TV writers—i.e., if you have a central character who's not a self-serving jerk like all the rest, don't turn him into one too, y'know? Just saying. – AndyFielding ( talk) 23:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)