![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I have disambiguated several blue links that were leading to the wrong articles. I used two rules:
— JIP | Talk 10:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
I reverted the wikilinks to the individual Titan novels, as at this point it is very unlikely that there will be individual articles for each novel when the Star Trek: Titan article is very comprehensive. Also, the Sword of Damocles link does not link to an article that is about a Star Trek novel. I don't think there is a need to have "red links" that will never be created. Newnam (talk) 21:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
A Rock and a Hard Place (Peter David), 1990 links to a Vietnam War novel by David Sherman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.244.86.60 ( talk • contribs)
Author Susan Wright's link has nothing to do with her, but with another Susan Wright.
I put a {{fact}} tag on the sentence about "most novels based on a single fictional universe". I've heard the claim made about Doctor Who novels as well — I'm not necessarily doubting that Star Trek may have more, but it would still be good to have a citation to back that up. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 04:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I seem to recall that Titan, the publishers of the Star Trek books in the UK, renumbered the original series books. I'm pondering whether it would be worth listing this renumbering, and if so, what format to do it in (the article is long enough that just having another list seems a bad idea) Morwen - Talk 16:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Here is the list annotated with the Titan numbers. It is somewhat random. They appear to have started in 1987, putting out new books and also random back catalogue. Things make an awful lot more sense to me now about these books. Having Battlestations! be the book immediately before "The Rift" makes no sense at all, for example. Don't know when they stopped this series. The last I can find in this series at amazon.ca is "The Great Starship Race", Pocket #67, but Titan #52, which just about fits with my memory.
i've just noticed that this article had (until I started table-ifying stuff) the books in pretty much the same structure as Voyages of the Imagination. I don't know to what extent that ordering is copyrightable- but at any rate it seems inappropriate, and I think makes my making things be chronological seem more appropriate. any suggestions as to how i should mark relaunch stuff? (or rather, non-relaunch stuff after an implied cut-off point?) Morwen - Talk 23:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Adding this in as a new question on the structure issue. Why is the Section 31 books for TNG and DS9 included with their respective sections, but the ones for TOS and VOY are not? I do not want to correct this before checking if there is a logic to it.
Ok, as noted on User_talk:JIP, I'm thinking that probably splitting this by "era" would be best, so having Enterprise/TOS/Vanguard books in one article, and then TNG/Voyager/DS9/Titan/IKS Gorkon/New Frontier/Stargazer books in another article, would be best. This poses a special problem for things like The Lost Era and the books featuring Spock and Kirk in the TNG era but branded under TOS, so guess those would want to be on both lists as appropriate. I will make a massive spreadsheet and then see what I can come up with. Morwen - Talk 10:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
In the above list of books, number 59 "The Disinherited" has an incorrect link. It points to a book by Jack Conroy published during the 1930's, not the Trek novel by the same title. I am unsure how to correct. -- Mountaineer1984 05:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I recently created the article on the Star Trek reference guide on the novels, " Voyages of Imagination". Feel more than free to expand and improve the article.-- DrWho42 ( talk) 20:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I was looking through the list and I noticed this slight jump:
No. | Title | Author | Released | Set |
---|---|---|---|---|
93 | New Earth, Book Five Thin Air |
Kristine Kathryn Rusch and Dean Wesley Smith | August 2000 | |
94 | New Earth, Book Six Challenger |
Diane Carey | August 2000 | |
95 | Rihannsu, Book Three Swordhunt |
Diane Duane | October 2000 | |
96 | Rihannsu, Book Four Honor Blade |
Diane Duane | October 2000 |
Shouldn't Rihannsu, Books One and Two be on that list as numbers 94 and 95? cdmajava There are always possibilities... 01:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know when and WHY the logo for the books was replaced with generic font? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.223.68 ( talk) 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
I just made a few corrections to the Pocket Books section where someone has attempted to list when certain novels take place chronologically. Several books are listed as taking place between Star Trek II and III, yet feature Spock (if you have to ask...); Black Fire likewise even though it is clearly described as occurring near the end of the 5-year mission (the TMP-era uniforms are introduced in one chapter). These errors give the impression that some Original Research/speculation is going on here. I suggest someone with a bit more knowledge of the novels, or perhaps a secondary resource that does list the chronology of each novel (I believe Pocket Books has one in its Voyages of Imagination compilation), police this information. I only fixed the ones I knew about. 70.72.215.252 ( talk) 14:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
IP edits sometimes get automatically deleted, it seems. In case it disappears, I added a missing misc. work to the list - Robert Picardo's The Hologram's Handbook, published by Simon & Schuster in 2002. 70.72.211.35 ( talk) 00:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Since there is a heading for Wanderer Books, it should include the YA novelization of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home by Peter Lerangis. I have this book, and it is from Wanderer Books (it should be noted that Wanderer Books was an imprint of Simon and Schuster, the parent company of Pocket Books.)
Checking the ISFDB, it appears that the four listed books and ST IV: The Voyage Home are the only Star Trek books from Wanderer.
I don't believe there are YA novelizations for ST V: The Final Frontier or ST VI: The Undiscovered Country. However, there ARE YA novelizations for each of the Next Generation films, all by John Vornholt. I don't have these, so I assume they are from Pocket Books instead of a juvenile imprint. I don't know if there are any YA adaptions for the 2009 film or the 2013 sequel.
On the next subject, mention should be made that the Generations paperback had a different ending from the hardcover. According to the Complete Starfleet Library, the hardcover used the film's original ending, which was reshot after the book had been printed. The paperback has the revised ending. http://www.well.com/~sjroby/lcars/1994.html#tngstg
Finally, many of the novelization links go to the film, instead of the article for the books. I don't know how Wikipedia handles things like that, whether it would be better to have a redlink that says Movie Name (book) or whether it's better to just link to the film. I thought the film pages should at least have a line or two mentioning the novelization and author, however. 68.97.202.205 ( talk) 21:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
67.191.130.139 introduced a large scale change whereby all the unnumbered novels in each series were given sequential numbers with those that were released during the numbered eras given .1 numerations. I know of no source that supports this change. I have reverted his/her changes to the TOS section but do not currently have the time or energy to undo all of the changes. I did not want to completely revert to before these changes as I do not want to lose subsequent edits. If no one else tackles the rest of 67.191.130.139's changes in the next few days I will undo them myself. -- Khajidha ( talk) 15:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The Autobiography of Kirk by David A. Goodman published in 2015 by Titan Books should be included in the List. 195.65.29.162 ( talk) 09:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
First, Strange New Worlds 2016 is an e-book. I added that; he deleted it for some reason.
This Wikipedia page is a reference list for Star Trek Novels (as well as Short Stories). There have been numerous (possibly hundreds) of books about Star Trek including various reference books or even fictional reference books that did not contain stories. The Miscellaneous Section of the Star Trek List of Novels page has for some reason included a few of these books. These include: The Ferengi Rules of Acquisition (Ira Steven Behr), July 1995 The Star Trek Cookbook (Ethan Phillips and William J Birnes), January 1999 The Hologram's Handbook (Robert Picardo, with art by Jeff Yagher), 2002 Additionally, for some reason the Miscellaneous section included books that are not miscellaneous but are listed under THe Next Generation. These include: Articles of the Federation (Keith R. A. DeCandido), May 2005 A Singular Destiny (Keith R. A. DeCandido), January 2009 Additionally the miscellaneous ection included books that are merely Omnibus volumes of DS9 books already listed in the DS9 section (if anything they should be listed in the DS9 section: Twist of Faith - DS9 "relaunch" reprint omnibus (S. D. Perry, David Weddle & Jeffrey Lang and Keith R. A. DeCandido), July 2007 These Haunted Seas - DS9 Mission Gamma reprint omnibus (David R. George III and Heather Jarman), June 2008 There have been hundreds and hundreds of Star Trek comic books. Many of these have been re-printed in "book"form (IDW constantly comes out with them). Why list just the Manga comics and not all the others? None should be listed as comics are not novels (or short stories). One volume missing of short stories (although parodies) that I had added is: Treks Not Taken which can be found here. https://www.amazon.com/Treks-Not-Taken-Vonnegut-Generation/dp/0060952768 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnemore ( talk • contribs) 02:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Star Trek novels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
I put a citation needed tag on the statement that the Original Series novels were terminated without explanation and that the company refuses to comment. I haven't been able to find any news source to support that the books have ended or that the company refuses to comment. I also don't think that last sentence is appropriate because it suggests Wikipedia has been seeking comment which goes against the mandate to be a secondary, not primary source. 96.51.188.175 ( talk) 01:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
How come the 12 Photo-Novels that were released in 1977-1978 are described as "Graphic Novels?" That term hadn't been created yet in 1977-1978, so wouldn't the original term be sufficient? I mean, it's descriptive enough that even youngsters and Millenials will know what "Photo-Novel" means. I don't think we should rename everything every couple years just because youngsters don't want to deal with traditions or reality. HaarFager ( talk) 05:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm getting the 32K warning as I add titles and author names to this article. Anyone want to suggest how best to split this into two articles? With so much crossover between series it's hard to just have separate pages for books based on TOS or DS9 or whatever, but it might be possible create a page just for the directly TOS-based books since that's the longest list. (I hope to add the remaining authors and titles after I return from a trip next week, but if anyone wants to fill in the rest of the blanks, be my guest!) 23skidoo 00:42, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Since they have multiple authors, and occasionally span series, how should anthologies be listed?
okay i've just started on time for war time for peace but i got a feeling i went into too much detail in the triva a) any suggestions b) is there a book page that is the "gold standard" ie set out properly not too much detail etc etc that i could look at to help me write better articles?
In my view, this article should remain a list of novels and novel-like works such as novelizations, anthologies, collections/omnibus, children's books, etc. I would also recommend this article not be renamed. ( WP:AVOIDEDITWAR). Rdzogschen ( talk) 21:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
The article should be limited to officially licensed Star Trek fiction. Star Wreck is not licensed by Paramount/CBS. If this is included then books based on The Orville should be included. Cnemore ( talk) 22:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Rdzogschen, if unnumbered Film Novelizations should not be in the Original Novels sections then it would seem that should also be true of unnumbered Video Game Novelizations. For consistency, only numbered novels that are part of another grouping should be listed in the Original Novels section. Cnemore ( talk) 22:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
My prior posting on these books merely pointed out that they were not crossover novels. Cnemore ( talk) 04:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Rdzogschen, The Klingon Hamlet features none of the characters of The Original Series and has nothing not do with the original series (although Hamlet is referred to as a Klingon work in Star Trek VI). If it is listed at all (the English portion is just a translation of the original Shakespeare into modern English) it should be in a separate section.
Also, we should bring back the sections on Audio books and it would be user-friendly to have ebook exclusives listed in one place like they used to be. Finally, there should be at least an asterisk next to books that were released in hard bound (like there used to be) as that is user-friendly information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnemore ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Apologies, but Stargazer is a flagship series, and was promoted as such by Pocket Books. None of the book covers have the Star Trek: The Next Generation logo. So, let's not make arbitrary choices about where to put books based on "feelings". Also, use this page to make comments instead of the WP:ES. Thanks Wanderer0 ( talk) 13:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Are the Signature Editions something we want to expand on? Imzadi Forever makes sense. As does Pantheon, and the McIntyre omnibus. Rdzogschen ( talk) 23:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
The Enterprise list had the first original novel, By the Book, being published in January 2001, which is impossible as the series didn't debut until September; I checked and it was an obvious typo for 2002 and I made the correction accordingly. 50.66.121.20 ( talk) 19:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I have disambiguated several blue links that were leading to the wrong articles. I used two rules:
— JIP | Talk 10:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
I reverted the wikilinks to the individual Titan novels, as at this point it is very unlikely that there will be individual articles for each novel when the Star Trek: Titan article is very comprehensive. Also, the Sword of Damocles link does not link to an article that is about a Star Trek novel. I don't think there is a need to have "red links" that will never be created. Newnam (talk) 21:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
A Rock and a Hard Place (Peter David), 1990 links to a Vietnam War novel by David Sherman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.244.86.60 ( talk • contribs)
Author Susan Wright's link has nothing to do with her, but with another Susan Wright.
I put a {{fact}} tag on the sentence about "most novels based on a single fictional universe". I've heard the claim made about Doctor Who novels as well — I'm not necessarily doubting that Star Trek may have more, but it would still be good to have a citation to back that up. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 04:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I seem to recall that Titan, the publishers of the Star Trek books in the UK, renumbered the original series books. I'm pondering whether it would be worth listing this renumbering, and if so, what format to do it in (the article is long enough that just having another list seems a bad idea) Morwen - Talk 16:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Here is the list annotated with the Titan numbers. It is somewhat random. They appear to have started in 1987, putting out new books and also random back catalogue. Things make an awful lot more sense to me now about these books. Having Battlestations! be the book immediately before "The Rift" makes no sense at all, for example. Don't know when they stopped this series. The last I can find in this series at amazon.ca is "The Great Starship Race", Pocket #67, but Titan #52, which just about fits with my memory.
i've just noticed that this article had (until I started table-ifying stuff) the books in pretty much the same structure as Voyages of the Imagination. I don't know to what extent that ordering is copyrightable- but at any rate it seems inappropriate, and I think makes my making things be chronological seem more appropriate. any suggestions as to how i should mark relaunch stuff? (or rather, non-relaunch stuff after an implied cut-off point?) Morwen - Talk 23:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Adding this in as a new question on the structure issue. Why is the Section 31 books for TNG and DS9 included with their respective sections, but the ones for TOS and VOY are not? I do not want to correct this before checking if there is a logic to it.
Ok, as noted on User_talk:JIP, I'm thinking that probably splitting this by "era" would be best, so having Enterprise/TOS/Vanguard books in one article, and then TNG/Voyager/DS9/Titan/IKS Gorkon/New Frontier/Stargazer books in another article, would be best. This poses a special problem for things like The Lost Era and the books featuring Spock and Kirk in the TNG era but branded under TOS, so guess those would want to be on both lists as appropriate. I will make a massive spreadsheet and then see what I can come up with. Morwen - Talk 10:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
In the above list of books, number 59 "The Disinherited" has an incorrect link. It points to a book by Jack Conroy published during the 1930's, not the Trek novel by the same title. I am unsure how to correct. -- Mountaineer1984 05:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I recently created the article on the Star Trek reference guide on the novels, " Voyages of Imagination". Feel more than free to expand and improve the article.-- DrWho42 ( talk) 20:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I was looking through the list and I noticed this slight jump:
No. | Title | Author | Released | Set |
---|---|---|---|---|
93 | New Earth, Book Five Thin Air |
Kristine Kathryn Rusch and Dean Wesley Smith | August 2000 | |
94 | New Earth, Book Six Challenger |
Diane Carey | August 2000 | |
95 | Rihannsu, Book Three Swordhunt |
Diane Duane | October 2000 | |
96 | Rihannsu, Book Four Honor Blade |
Diane Duane | October 2000 |
Shouldn't Rihannsu, Books One and Two be on that list as numbers 94 and 95? cdmajava There are always possibilities... 01:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know when and WHY the logo for the books was replaced with generic font? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.223.68 ( talk) 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
I just made a few corrections to the Pocket Books section where someone has attempted to list when certain novels take place chronologically. Several books are listed as taking place between Star Trek II and III, yet feature Spock (if you have to ask...); Black Fire likewise even though it is clearly described as occurring near the end of the 5-year mission (the TMP-era uniforms are introduced in one chapter). These errors give the impression that some Original Research/speculation is going on here. I suggest someone with a bit more knowledge of the novels, or perhaps a secondary resource that does list the chronology of each novel (I believe Pocket Books has one in its Voyages of Imagination compilation), police this information. I only fixed the ones I knew about. 70.72.215.252 ( talk) 14:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
IP edits sometimes get automatically deleted, it seems. In case it disappears, I added a missing misc. work to the list - Robert Picardo's The Hologram's Handbook, published by Simon & Schuster in 2002. 70.72.211.35 ( talk) 00:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Since there is a heading for Wanderer Books, it should include the YA novelization of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home by Peter Lerangis. I have this book, and it is from Wanderer Books (it should be noted that Wanderer Books was an imprint of Simon and Schuster, the parent company of Pocket Books.)
Checking the ISFDB, it appears that the four listed books and ST IV: The Voyage Home are the only Star Trek books from Wanderer.
I don't believe there are YA novelizations for ST V: The Final Frontier or ST VI: The Undiscovered Country. However, there ARE YA novelizations for each of the Next Generation films, all by John Vornholt. I don't have these, so I assume they are from Pocket Books instead of a juvenile imprint. I don't know if there are any YA adaptions for the 2009 film or the 2013 sequel.
On the next subject, mention should be made that the Generations paperback had a different ending from the hardcover. According to the Complete Starfleet Library, the hardcover used the film's original ending, which was reshot after the book had been printed. The paperback has the revised ending. http://www.well.com/~sjroby/lcars/1994.html#tngstg
Finally, many of the novelization links go to the film, instead of the article for the books. I don't know how Wikipedia handles things like that, whether it would be better to have a redlink that says Movie Name (book) or whether it's better to just link to the film. I thought the film pages should at least have a line or two mentioning the novelization and author, however. 68.97.202.205 ( talk) 21:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
67.191.130.139 introduced a large scale change whereby all the unnumbered novels in each series were given sequential numbers with those that were released during the numbered eras given .1 numerations. I know of no source that supports this change. I have reverted his/her changes to the TOS section but do not currently have the time or energy to undo all of the changes. I did not want to completely revert to before these changes as I do not want to lose subsequent edits. If no one else tackles the rest of 67.191.130.139's changes in the next few days I will undo them myself. -- Khajidha ( talk) 15:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The Autobiography of Kirk by David A. Goodman published in 2015 by Titan Books should be included in the List. 195.65.29.162 ( talk) 09:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
First, Strange New Worlds 2016 is an e-book. I added that; he deleted it for some reason.
This Wikipedia page is a reference list for Star Trek Novels (as well as Short Stories). There have been numerous (possibly hundreds) of books about Star Trek including various reference books or even fictional reference books that did not contain stories. The Miscellaneous Section of the Star Trek List of Novels page has for some reason included a few of these books. These include: The Ferengi Rules of Acquisition (Ira Steven Behr), July 1995 The Star Trek Cookbook (Ethan Phillips and William J Birnes), January 1999 The Hologram's Handbook (Robert Picardo, with art by Jeff Yagher), 2002 Additionally, for some reason the Miscellaneous section included books that are not miscellaneous but are listed under THe Next Generation. These include: Articles of the Federation (Keith R. A. DeCandido), May 2005 A Singular Destiny (Keith R. A. DeCandido), January 2009 Additionally the miscellaneous ection included books that are merely Omnibus volumes of DS9 books already listed in the DS9 section (if anything they should be listed in the DS9 section: Twist of Faith - DS9 "relaunch" reprint omnibus (S. D. Perry, David Weddle & Jeffrey Lang and Keith R. A. DeCandido), July 2007 These Haunted Seas - DS9 Mission Gamma reprint omnibus (David R. George III and Heather Jarman), June 2008 There have been hundreds and hundreds of Star Trek comic books. Many of these have been re-printed in "book"form (IDW constantly comes out with them). Why list just the Manga comics and not all the others? None should be listed as comics are not novels (or short stories). One volume missing of short stories (although parodies) that I had added is: Treks Not Taken which can be found here. https://www.amazon.com/Treks-Not-Taken-Vonnegut-Generation/dp/0060952768 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnemore ( talk • contribs) 02:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Star Trek novels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
I put a citation needed tag on the statement that the Original Series novels were terminated without explanation and that the company refuses to comment. I haven't been able to find any news source to support that the books have ended or that the company refuses to comment. I also don't think that last sentence is appropriate because it suggests Wikipedia has been seeking comment which goes against the mandate to be a secondary, not primary source. 96.51.188.175 ( talk) 01:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
How come the 12 Photo-Novels that were released in 1977-1978 are described as "Graphic Novels?" That term hadn't been created yet in 1977-1978, so wouldn't the original term be sufficient? I mean, it's descriptive enough that even youngsters and Millenials will know what "Photo-Novel" means. I don't think we should rename everything every couple years just because youngsters don't want to deal with traditions or reality. HaarFager ( talk) 05:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm getting the 32K warning as I add titles and author names to this article. Anyone want to suggest how best to split this into two articles? With so much crossover between series it's hard to just have separate pages for books based on TOS or DS9 or whatever, but it might be possible create a page just for the directly TOS-based books since that's the longest list. (I hope to add the remaining authors and titles after I return from a trip next week, but if anyone wants to fill in the rest of the blanks, be my guest!) 23skidoo 00:42, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Since they have multiple authors, and occasionally span series, how should anthologies be listed?
okay i've just started on time for war time for peace but i got a feeling i went into too much detail in the triva a) any suggestions b) is there a book page that is the "gold standard" ie set out properly not too much detail etc etc that i could look at to help me write better articles?
In my view, this article should remain a list of novels and novel-like works such as novelizations, anthologies, collections/omnibus, children's books, etc. I would also recommend this article not be renamed. ( WP:AVOIDEDITWAR). Rdzogschen ( talk) 21:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
The article should be limited to officially licensed Star Trek fiction. Star Wreck is not licensed by Paramount/CBS. If this is included then books based on The Orville should be included. Cnemore ( talk) 22:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Rdzogschen, if unnumbered Film Novelizations should not be in the Original Novels sections then it would seem that should also be true of unnumbered Video Game Novelizations. For consistency, only numbered novels that are part of another grouping should be listed in the Original Novels section. Cnemore ( talk) 22:52, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
My prior posting on these books merely pointed out that they were not crossover novels. Cnemore ( talk) 04:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Rdzogschen, The Klingon Hamlet features none of the characters of The Original Series and has nothing not do with the original series (although Hamlet is referred to as a Klingon work in Star Trek VI). If it is listed at all (the English portion is just a translation of the original Shakespeare into modern English) it should be in a separate section.
Also, we should bring back the sections on Audio books and it would be user-friendly to have ebook exclusives listed in one place like they used to be. Finally, there should be at least an asterisk next to books that were released in hard bound (like there used to be) as that is user-friendly information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnemore ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Apologies, but Stargazer is a flagship series, and was promoted as such by Pocket Books. None of the book covers have the Star Trek: The Next Generation logo. So, let's not make arbitrary choices about where to put books based on "feelings". Also, use this page to make comments instead of the WP:ES. Thanks Wanderer0 ( talk) 13:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Are the Signature Editions something we want to expand on? Imzadi Forever makes sense. As does Pantheon, and the McIntyre omnibus. Rdzogschen ( talk) 23:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
The Enterprise list had the first original novel, By the Book, being published in January 2001, which is impossible as the series didn't debut until September; I checked and it was an obvious typo for 2002 and I made the correction accordingly. 50.66.121.20 ( talk) 19:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)