This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Sicilian monarchs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Frederick II is also known as Frederick I of Sicily (understandable, seeing he was in fact the first Frederick of Sicily). ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 02:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Good job to whoever add much of the information, however I feel there should be an article List of viceroys of Sicily for the viceroys as they weren't actually Kings... I'll put them here on the talk if anyone wants to create such an article. I have done something similar on the List of monarchs of Naples article. - Gennarous ( talk) 16:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
In the list of Habsburgs that acted as kings of Sicily, Charles, the last of dinasty in Spain, appears as: 'Charles III'. He may have been the third Charles sitting in the Sicilian throne, but in Spain he was: 'Charles II', and he had the right of acting as king of Sicily by having inherited the rights from the kings of Aragon. Which number should prevail in this case, the one he had in Spain, 'Charles II', or the one appearing in the list: 'Charles III?. I'd support Charles II, as Sicily wasn't then an independent kingdom, but part of the territories where kings of Aragon, meaning kings of Spain, ruled. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgrosay ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Who the fuck added all this Irish shit, ruining the page? Fuck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwarsbv ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Sicilian monarchs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Frederick II is also known as Frederick I of Sicily (understandable, seeing he was in fact the first Frederick of Sicily). ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 02:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Good job to whoever add much of the information, however I feel there should be an article List of viceroys of Sicily for the viceroys as they weren't actually Kings... I'll put them here on the talk if anyone wants to create such an article. I have done something similar on the List of monarchs of Naples article. - Gennarous ( talk) 16:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
In the list of Habsburgs that acted as kings of Sicily, Charles, the last of dinasty in Spain, appears as: 'Charles III'. He may have been the third Charles sitting in the Sicilian throne, but in Spain he was: 'Charles II', and he had the right of acting as king of Sicily by having inherited the rights from the kings of Aragon. Which number should prevail in this case, the one he had in Spain, 'Charles II', or the one appearing in the list: 'Charles III?. I'd support Charles II, as Sicily wasn't then an independent kingdom, but part of the territories where kings of Aragon, meaning kings of Spain, ruled. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgrosay ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Who the fuck added all this Irish shit, ruining the page? Fuck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwarsbv ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)