![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am a voip guy, not a wikipedian, so i will let the editing be. But the Siemens "7xx" response codes seem misplaced. They are not part of the standard ietf rfcs, they are not industry standard. They should not be here. You dont see the american ammendments in an article about German law.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.119.140.4 ( talk • contribs) 07:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
I've started adding detailed descriptions of the response codes, using RFC 3261 as the source material. However, this is my first time contributing to Wikipedia, so I'm sure I've messed up in some way. As such I've only done the 1xx section for now, and will allow time for someone to revert/fix my edit if it is not done correctly. 98.173.30.120 ( talk) 02:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm hoping to get this article to featured list status, and that's currently looking like a one-person effort. That's simply because I'm the only person editing, however; I'm not attempting to own the article. Other editors' contributions would most definitely be welcomed!
In order to reach WP:FL status, I'm trying to get everything into a consistent state. Here's a bunch of relatively arbitrary decisions I've made in the name of consistency, and my reasoning for them:
Here are some things that still need doing before the article will be ready to be looked at for WP:FL:
I'm intending to keep the above lists up-to-date with the article state. I'll sign any changes for clarity, and since the middle of the above lists is not really a great place to discuss, I'll avoid updating the list where I don't think there's consensus. Other editors should feel free to do the same.
(On consensus for the above changes, I'm assuming WP:SILENCE applies. Thus if I make a change, update the above, and there's disagreement, I'll update the above again and reference wherever the discussion is taking place.)
— me_ and 19:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am a voip guy, not a wikipedian, so i will let the editing be. But the Siemens "7xx" response codes seem misplaced. They are not part of the standard ietf rfcs, they are not industry standard. They should not be here. You dont see the american ammendments in an article about German law.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.119.140.4 ( talk • contribs) 07:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
I've started adding detailed descriptions of the response codes, using RFC 3261 as the source material. However, this is my first time contributing to Wikipedia, so I'm sure I've messed up in some way. As such I've only done the 1xx section for now, and will allow time for someone to revert/fix my edit if it is not done correctly. 98.173.30.120 ( talk) 02:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm hoping to get this article to featured list status, and that's currently looking like a one-person effort. That's simply because I'm the only person editing, however; I'm not attempting to own the article. Other editors' contributions would most definitely be welcomed!
In order to reach WP:FL status, I'm trying to get everything into a consistent state. Here's a bunch of relatively arbitrary decisions I've made in the name of consistency, and my reasoning for them:
Here are some things that still need doing before the article will be ready to be looked at for WP:FL:
I'm intending to keep the above lists up-to-date with the article state. I'll sign any changes for clarity, and since the middle of the above lists is not really a great place to discuss, I'll avoid updating the list where I don't think there's consensus. Other editors should feel free to do the same.
(On consensus for the above changes, I'm assuming WP:SILENCE applies. Thus if I make a change, update the above, and there's disagreement, I'll update the above again and reference wherever the discussion is taking place.)
— me_ and 19:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)