![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Introduction don't reflect the recent extension to cover the 2022 conflict. Yug (talk) 🐲 16:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
The KRISS Vector and Beretta Cx4 Storm are not semi-auto only, correct? They should fall under a different category, moreso in Submachine guns if I'm not mistaken. Thoughts? Mimotakito111 ( talk) 23:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Should captured equipment be listed in this article? I think it's fair to assume that if a particular piece of equipment is being used by one side of the war, some units could be captured by the other side. There's no need to double-list that equipment under both Ukraine and Russia.
Even if captured equipment should be listed, it should be clearly marked as such. In addition, Russian equipment captured by Ukrainians should be listed as well - something that wasn't done by the original author, who clearly had a pro-Russian bias (as further indicated by their choice of references).
Akhaiet (
talk)
04:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
The article makes no mention of improvised weapons, such as the Trembita bomb. See also: Improvised artillery in the Syrian civil war. I think an article on Improvised military equipment of the Russo-Ukraine War is justifiable (sourceable). Improvised in the sense of designed and built outside the military industry, such as field innovation or entrepreneurial garage shops. This is different from professional weapons that are repurposed. -- Green C 05:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Introduction don't reflect the recent extension to cover the 2022 conflict. Yug (talk) 🐲 16:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
The KRISS Vector and Beretta Cx4 Storm are not semi-auto only, correct? They should fall under a different category, moreso in Submachine guns if I'm not mistaken. Thoughts? Mimotakito111 ( talk) 23:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Should captured equipment be listed in this article? I think it's fair to assume that if a particular piece of equipment is being used by one side of the war, some units could be captured by the other side. There's no need to double-list that equipment under both Ukraine and Russia.
Even if captured equipment should be listed, it should be clearly marked as such. In addition, Russian equipment captured by Ukrainians should be listed as well - something that wasn't done by the original author, who clearly had a pro-Russian bias (as further indicated by their choice of references).
Akhaiet (
talk)
04:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
The article makes no mention of improvised weapons, such as the Trembita bomb. See also: Improvised artillery in the Syrian civil war. I think an article on Improvised military equipment of the Russo-Ukraine War is justifiable (sourceable). Improvised in the sense of designed and built outside the military industry, such as field innovation or entrepreneurial garage shops. This is different from professional weapons that are repurposed. -- Green C 05:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)