From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

The article still lacks references for all of the entries. The references added today consist of new entries, 2 of which are simply commercial directories of fashion or wedding photographers. Wikipedia is not an advertising vehicle. The third new entry is an article which is more editorial than critical of the artistic merit of the photographer. None of the added entries have Wikipedia entries, and references are only available as self-published books or Facebook pages. The exisitng 6 entries also have concerns of notability as previously expressed. WP:Notability is absent in this article. N0TABENE ( talk) 20:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Added Sadia Khan, removed unsourced template because I can see a reference and you can remove it by saying it's not reliable).

The entire article remains unsourced. There is a single, unreliable commercial directory listing used as a reference without regard to notability for a single entry, not for the entire article. The article remains without adequate referencing, which you persist in ignoring but instead, choose to delete the template tags. See WP:REF for guidance in how to properly reference articles. N0TABENE ( talk) 21:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

The article still lacks references for all of the entries. The references added today consist of new entries, 2 of which are simply commercial directories of fashion or wedding photographers. Wikipedia is not an advertising vehicle. The third new entry is an article which is more editorial than critical of the artistic merit of the photographer. None of the added entries have Wikipedia entries, and references are only available as self-published books or Facebook pages. The exisitng 6 entries also have concerns of notability as previously expressed. WP:Notability is absent in this article. N0TABENE ( talk) 20:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Added Sadia Khan, removed unsourced template because I can see a reference and you can remove it by saying it's not reliable).

The entire article remains unsourced. There is a single, unreliable commercial directory listing used as a reference without regard to notability for a single entry, not for the entire article. The article remains without adequate referencing, which you persist in ignoring but instead, choose to delete the template tags. See WP:REF for guidance in how to properly reference articles. N0TABENE ( talk) 21:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook