![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All of the sources here are for the 2016 season. Currently there is no way, beyond original research, to determine which scores, analyses etc... are the "best". The article needs a set of sources which combine both years worth of statistics. Without that it's not really viable as an article. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Explaining my edit here.
I have tried to simplify the code, which might help for easy code-reading and editing.
Help would be appreciated, Thanks! M. Billoo 17:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC) [Update: M. Billoo 23:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
A few days back I have created a page titled ' best dismissals', which User:Mar4d recently moved to 'bowling records'. Well I understand the reason that the previous title by me was not good, but there are many other bowling records too from which top 5(s) are listed in ' records and statistics' page. I think only 'bowling records' will not be a suitable title for that page, should we move it to 'best dismissal records' or 'best bowling figures in an innings (too long)' or something else?
I also have created a ' centuries list page', and I wish to add 'partnership century records' in it too. May I?
Suppose comparing with IPL pages, they have created separate page only for five-wicket hauls, and in centuries list they only have added individual batting century. Also many other details are listed in records and statistics page. So, I also want to add info as much as in IPL pages. Hope you understand my weak English, Thanks! M. Billoo 20:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All of the sources here are for the 2016 season. Currently there is no way, beyond original research, to determine which scores, analyses etc... are the "best". The article needs a set of sources which combine both years worth of statistics. Without that it's not really viable as an article. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Explaining my edit here.
I have tried to simplify the code, which might help for easy code-reading and editing.
Help would be appreciated, Thanks! M. Billoo 17:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC) [Update: M. Billoo 23:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
A few days back I have created a page titled ' best dismissals', which User:Mar4d recently moved to 'bowling records'. Well I understand the reason that the previous title by me was not good, but there are many other bowling records too from which top 5(s) are listed in ' records and statistics' page. I think only 'bowling records' will not be a suitable title for that page, should we move it to 'best dismissal records' or 'best bowling figures in an innings (too long)' or something else?
I also have created a ' centuries list page', and I wish to add 'partnership century records' in it too. May I?
Suppose comparing with IPL pages, they have created separate page only for five-wicket hauls, and in centuries list they only have added individual batting century. Also many other details are listed in records and statistics page. So, I also want to add info as much as in IPL pages. Hope you understand my weak English, Thanks! M. Billoo 20:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)