List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry is part of the Nobel laureates series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured list |
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to try and fix the image issues tomorrow. I don't have the time to hunt down sources, so I'm just going to remove any outdated ones. Just so I'm clear, I should remove any that match the first three examples you gave on the FLC page, right? -- Scorpion 0422 02:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Here are a few ideas:
Some examples of this:
And so on...
I realise the "details" section may be a step too far (and would start to overlap quite a lot with other articles), but I'd like to see someone attempt that. In my view, annotated lists should try to go beyond what the main source tells us, while still obviously supporting things at every stage with sources. I'd like at the least to see a "see also" or "further reading" column, with a list of articles related directly to the citation. This would allow the direct quotes to be delinked, but would still allow people to read up on things further, either by reading the article on the person, or reading about the history of the discoveries by another route (the chemistry articles). Maybe this is something for a separate article, or for the main Chemistry Nobel article, but at the least I'd like to see the linking reduced, or massively improved. At the moment, the linking from the citations column is a mix of good links and rather weak, irrelevant linking. Again, I could have a go at listing some relevant articles related to each citation, but wouldn't be comfortable linking them from the quote - it would have to be as an aside in a new column. Carcharoth ( talk) 10:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
PS. I found someone at Commons to help with the images. See commons:User talk:Nard the Bard#Image check request. Not sure if he will come here or we go there. Do you have a Commons account activated? Carcharoth ( talk) 20:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Likely to be a perennial question at this and similar articles, so I'm linking here to the latest state (as of time of writing) of a discussion at WT:MOSLINK (the manual of style guidance on links): here. The current discussion is here, though that link will need updating when it gets archived. Carcharoth ( talk) 01:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
There are a large number of older images which claim that they are in the public domain under Swedish law. See, for example, File:Joliot-curie.jpg. Are these claims accurate, and are these images appropriate to be used in this article given the FL status? Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 02:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Shechtman Technion.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Shechtman.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Max Perutz.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Max Perutz.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Adolf Friedrich Johann Butenandt 1939.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Adolf Friedrich Johann Butenandt 1939.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Hermann Staudinger Nobel.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hermann Staudinger Nobel.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:George de Hevesy.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:George de Hevesy.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
I would like to make the table sortable so i can sort the list by country to see which countries have the most. This will require that the "not awarded" years have the fields intact. Does anyone have objections? -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 16:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
164.127.149.188 ( talk) 13:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
There is an error for 2017 nobel Prize in chemistry . Should be: for developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
For the 1996 prize, make the word fullerenes link to the article on Fullerenes. 82.69.45.180 ( talk) 18:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
What is the exact source for the entries in the Country column? The general statement that this is from nobelprize.org, does not really help much. I am a bit surprised to see Hevesy with Germany, and with the Nazi German flag it may seem a bit awkward as well. I also did note that at some point in time Hungary was stated, but this has been changed by a user, who has been indefinitely blocked since then for „Persistent addition of unsourced content: Failure to communicate with fellow editors”. So where Germany is coming from? Szaszicska ( talk) 21:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear IP,
please stop further disruption as you did in the main page and discuss there.( KIENGIR ( talk) 20:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC))
Dear Wikipedians I have realised that this page is not completed. Note that in 2013 a South African chemist also won the Nobel prize . Please can I get help to complete and fix this problem. Thanks Einstein's bff ( talk) 17:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Nonsense. The article cites the complete list published by the Nobel prize committee at "The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2013". Nobelprize.org. Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 9 October 2013., which has only the 3 names already in the article. And prizes in science categories are limited to 3 persons per year. Dirac66 ( talk) 18:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
I think the Image column in the Laureates table is redundant and should be removed. Anyone interested in knowing more about a laureate and seeing his/her image can visit the linked Wikipedia page. Mas73Naz ( talk) 06:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry is part of the Nobel laureates series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured list |
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm going to try and fix the image issues tomorrow. I don't have the time to hunt down sources, so I'm just going to remove any outdated ones. Just so I'm clear, I should remove any that match the first three examples you gave on the FLC page, right? -- Scorpion 0422 02:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Here are a few ideas:
Some examples of this:
And so on...
I realise the "details" section may be a step too far (and would start to overlap quite a lot with other articles), but I'd like to see someone attempt that. In my view, annotated lists should try to go beyond what the main source tells us, while still obviously supporting things at every stage with sources. I'd like at the least to see a "see also" or "further reading" column, with a list of articles related directly to the citation. This would allow the direct quotes to be delinked, but would still allow people to read up on things further, either by reading the article on the person, or reading about the history of the discoveries by another route (the chemistry articles). Maybe this is something for a separate article, or for the main Chemistry Nobel article, but at the least I'd like to see the linking reduced, or massively improved. At the moment, the linking from the citations column is a mix of good links and rather weak, irrelevant linking. Again, I could have a go at listing some relevant articles related to each citation, but wouldn't be comfortable linking them from the quote - it would have to be as an aside in a new column. Carcharoth ( talk) 10:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
PS. I found someone at Commons to help with the images. See commons:User talk:Nard the Bard#Image check request. Not sure if he will come here or we go there. Do you have a Commons account activated? Carcharoth ( talk) 20:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Likely to be a perennial question at this and similar articles, so I'm linking here to the latest state (as of time of writing) of a discussion at WT:MOSLINK (the manual of style guidance on links): here. The current discussion is here, though that link will need updating when it gets archived. Carcharoth ( talk) 01:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
There are a large number of older images which claim that they are in the public domain under Swedish law. See, for example, File:Joliot-curie.jpg. Are these claims accurate, and are these images appropriate to be used in this article given the FL status? Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 02:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Shechtman Technion.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Shechtman.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Max Perutz.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Max Perutz.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Adolf Friedrich Johann Butenandt 1939.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Adolf Friedrich Johann Butenandt 1939.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Hermann Staudinger Nobel.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hermann Staudinger Nobel.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:George de Hevesy.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:George de Hevesy.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
I would like to make the table sortable so i can sort the list by country to see which countries have the most. This will require that the "not awarded" years have the fields intact. Does anyone have objections? -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 16:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
164.127.149.188 ( talk) 13:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
There is an error for 2017 nobel Prize in chemistry . Should be: for developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
For the 1996 prize, make the word fullerenes link to the article on Fullerenes. 82.69.45.180 ( talk) 18:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
What is the exact source for the entries in the Country column? The general statement that this is from nobelprize.org, does not really help much. I am a bit surprised to see Hevesy with Germany, and with the Nazi German flag it may seem a bit awkward as well. I also did note that at some point in time Hungary was stated, but this has been changed by a user, who has been indefinitely blocked since then for „Persistent addition of unsourced content: Failure to communicate with fellow editors”. So where Germany is coming from? Szaszicska ( talk) 21:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear IP,
please stop further disruption as you did in the main page and discuss there.( KIENGIR ( talk) 20:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC))
Dear Wikipedians I have realised that this page is not completed. Note that in 2013 a South African chemist also won the Nobel prize . Please can I get help to complete and fix this problem. Thanks Einstein's bff ( talk) 17:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Nonsense. The article cites the complete list published by the Nobel prize committee at "The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2013". Nobelprize.org. Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 9 October 2013., which has only the 3 names already in the article. And prizes in science categories are limited to 3 persons per year. Dirac66 ( talk) 18:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
I think the Image column in the Laureates table is redundant and should be removed. Anyone interested in knowing more about a laureate and seeing his/her image can visit the linked Wikipedia page. Mas73Naz ( talk) 06:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)