This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Nikon F-mount lenses with integrated autofocus motor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Mainly used D40/x/D60 Club Wiki: List of Autofocus-Compatible Lenses to create this list. This page is under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows copying and editing.
Changed and expanded.
Hopefully there are authors that help to complete this list. Wispanow ( talk) 14:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Almost every item in the list is a zoom. Are there really so few non-zooms in this category? 72.229.58.135 ( talk) 22:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Should the F-number notation be changed from "1:xx" to "f/xx"? Because I think that "f/xx" is generally more widely accepted and recognisable than "1:xx". [SCΛRECROW] CrossCom 2.0 03:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Some guys asked me, which lens i recommend. Data comes from a not realized project and are mostly measured with Kodak 14nx and D300, partly with added teleconverters to increase resolution. Generally:
Lenses not listed are mostly valuated as not interesting because other lenses giving better price/performance ratio.
Wispanow (
talk)
23:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
18-200 VR and 18-200 VRII are optically identical and have identical MTF charts, so it is strange to see different image quality values assigned to them. -- One half 3544 ( talk) 11:01, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I've introduced a sortable wikitable for the lenses, with the idea that it may be easier for users to parse without the colors/underscores/whatever to communicate attributes. We can change it around as needed, or delete it if people don't like it. The reason for sorting is so that people can decide what they're interested in. That is, once filled-out, there will be a list of all makes, all models, all attributes, and a user can sort on whatever they like. If they don't care about the make, they can sort on length, or type, or attributes, date range, or even whether we've provided an image. Comments? - Denimadept ( talk) 00:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
I like the idea of the table, but if that isn't going to happen, I think that the subsections that have both zooms and primes (such as "wide-angle") should be subdivided accordingly. That is:
Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Done
Bubba73
You talkin' to me?
06:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
What do the underscores that are not links indicate? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
1. Why is the number of lenses by each maker needed in the section title?
2. Since this number changes, I think it is a bad idea to put it in the section title, because if another article links to the section title, and the title changes because a new lens is introduced, that will break the link. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 20:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
When did these lenses first appear? I assume it was in November 2006, along with the D40. This should be in the article. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Some of the Sigma lenses listed here don't carry the "HSM" designation indicating some kind of hypersonic auto-focus motor in the lens. I'm not particularly familiar with Sigma lenses for Nikon, but have there been Sigma lenses with (other types of) in-lens AF motors not indicated by the HSM designation? If yes, the lens names in the list are probably incomplete. If not, some of the lenses marked with "???" don't seem to belong here and should be removed. I hope someone more familiar with "Sigma for Nikon" can sort this out. Thanks. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 12:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Nikon F-mount lenses with integrated autofocus motor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Nikon F-mount lenses with integrated autofocus motor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Mainly used D40/x/D60 Club Wiki: List of Autofocus-Compatible Lenses to create this list. This page is under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows copying and editing.
Changed and expanded.
Hopefully there are authors that help to complete this list. Wispanow ( talk) 14:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Almost every item in the list is a zoom. Are there really so few non-zooms in this category? 72.229.58.135 ( talk) 22:37, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Should the F-number notation be changed from "1:xx" to "f/xx"? Because I think that "f/xx" is generally more widely accepted and recognisable than "1:xx". [SCΛRECROW] CrossCom 2.0 03:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Some guys asked me, which lens i recommend. Data comes from a not realized project and are mostly measured with Kodak 14nx and D300, partly with added teleconverters to increase resolution. Generally:
Lenses not listed are mostly valuated as not interesting because other lenses giving better price/performance ratio.
Wispanow (
talk)
23:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
18-200 VR and 18-200 VRII are optically identical and have identical MTF charts, so it is strange to see different image quality values assigned to them. -- One half 3544 ( talk) 11:01, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I've introduced a sortable wikitable for the lenses, with the idea that it may be easier for users to parse without the colors/underscores/whatever to communicate attributes. We can change it around as needed, or delete it if people don't like it. The reason for sorting is so that people can decide what they're interested in. That is, once filled-out, there will be a list of all makes, all models, all attributes, and a user can sort on whatever they like. If they don't care about the make, they can sort on length, or type, or attributes, date range, or even whether we've provided an image. Comments? - Denimadept ( talk) 00:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
I like the idea of the table, but if that isn't going to happen, I think that the subsections that have both zooms and primes (such as "wide-angle") should be subdivided accordingly. That is:
Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Done
Bubba73
You talkin' to me?
06:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
What do the underscores that are not links indicate? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
1. Why is the number of lenses by each maker needed in the section title?
2. Since this number changes, I think it is a bad idea to put it in the section title, because if another article links to the section title, and the title changes because a new lens is introduced, that will break the link. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 20:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
When did these lenses first appear? I assume it was in November 2006, along with the D40. This should be in the article. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Some of the Sigma lenses listed here don't carry the "HSM" designation indicating some kind of hypersonic auto-focus motor in the lens. I'm not particularly familiar with Sigma lenses for Nikon, but have there been Sigma lenses with (other types of) in-lens AF motors not indicated by the HSM designation? If yes, the lens names in the list are probably incomplete. If not, some of the lenses marked with "???" don't seem to belong here and should be removed. I hope someone more familiar with "Sigma for Nikon" can sort this out. Thanks. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 12:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Nikon F-mount lenses with integrated autofocus motor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)