This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Can we please define "New Thought" on the list page so there's a context? I don't think anyone gets what "New Thought" is and I shouldn't have to guess from reading the first 2-3 entries, because I couldn't possibly understand what defines a new thought or independent center.
JFirestone 15:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Can other readers tell what is intended by the phrase "historically based" on this page? I suspect this is not grammatically valid, and I wonder if there might be another way to phrase this. Other thoughts? - Sara FB ( talk) 06:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of New Thought denominations and independent centers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Can we please define "New Thought" on the list page so there's a context? I don't think anyone gets what "New Thought" is and I shouldn't have to guess from reading the first 2-3 entries, because I couldn't possibly understand what defines a new thought or independent center.
JFirestone 15:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Can other readers tell what is intended by the phrase "historically based" on this page? I suspect this is not grammatically valid, and I wonder if there might be another way to phrase this. Other thoughts? - Sara FB ( talk) 06:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of New Thought denominations and independent centers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)