From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inclusion Criteria

Per WP:LIST, this list needs to have an explicitly stated inclusion criteria somewhere in the article. (Even lists that seem obvious from the name of the article need clear-cut explicit inclusion criteria). If this survives AfD, this needs to be addressed. -- Bfigura ( talk) 05:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC) reply

  • I completely agree. There is no justification for the inclusion of the organisations that are currently in this list, as the current references provide verification, but don't assert notability. Heavy clean-up needed. I will put an appropriate tag on the list. — gorgan_almighty 08:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Remove the out of scale table

Any objection to making this a normal bulleted list?-- Editor2020 ( talk) 03:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply

A table makes sense. Helps keep the data organized. -- DeknMike ( talk) 01:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Notability problems

This article seems to have a lot of notability issues. If these groups are notable, they should have wikipedia articles, if not they shouldn't be listed. Editor2020 ( talk) 02:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Well, that's a circular logic. If it's notable it has a wiki page, and if it has a wiki page it's notable. Much of what passes for notability in the popular press is social fluff, and Wikipedia is supposed to be the information source, filling in the details.-- DeknMike ( talk) 02:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC) reply

No, what I'm saying is that instead of putting a redlink here, (or adding an unlinked, unreferenced listing which tells me nothing} create an article. Provide sources, show notability. Editor2020 ( talk) 04:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Add this to list

Behold Israel is run by Amir Tsirfati. Hes a Messianic Jew. He lives in Israel. 2601:601:51D:FB:A52F:703C:536C:A70D ( talk) 18:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inclusion Criteria

Per WP:LIST, this list needs to have an explicitly stated inclusion criteria somewhere in the article. (Even lists that seem obvious from the name of the article need clear-cut explicit inclusion criteria). If this survives AfD, this needs to be addressed. -- Bfigura ( talk) 05:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC) reply

  • I completely agree. There is no justification for the inclusion of the organisations that are currently in this list, as the current references provide verification, but don't assert notability. Heavy clean-up needed. I will put an appropriate tag on the list. — gorgan_almighty 08:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Remove the out of scale table

Any objection to making this a normal bulleted list?-- Editor2020 ( talk) 03:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply

A table makes sense. Helps keep the data organized. -- DeknMike ( talk) 01:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Notability problems

This article seems to have a lot of notability issues. If these groups are notable, they should have wikipedia articles, if not they shouldn't be listed. Editor2020 ( talk) 02:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Well, that's a circular logic. If it's notable it has a wiki page, and if it has a wiki page it's notable. Much of what passes for notability in the popular press is social fluff, and Wikipedia is supposed to be the information source, filling in the details.-- DeknMike ( talk) 02:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC) reply

No, what I'm saying is that instead of putting a redlink here, (or adding an unlinked, unreferenced listing which tells me nothing} create an article. Provide sources, show notability. Editor2020 ( talk) 04:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Add this to list

Behold Israel is run by Amir Tsirfati. Hes a Messianic Jew. He lives in Israel. 2601:601:51D:FB:A52F:703C:536C:A70D ( talk) 18:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook