This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Latin Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Would there be any objection to my adding Lacrimae rerum to this collection EvanJPW ( talk) 15:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Ah, I see it's in the letter S section, under Sunt Lacrimae rerum. But the main article in Wikipedia is called Lacrimae rerum, not Sunt Lacrimae rerum, so I am wondering if it, at minimum, needs to be here as well. EvanJPW ( talk) 16:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I would question whether the lex tempus entry is relevant Solipsist ( talk) 16:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Well spotted, thank you. I agree that that term is irrelevant here, especially as that work isn't even mentioned on the alleged composer's page, Ray Buttigieg. Now removed.-- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 11:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply