From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

Good start, IFaqeer! Zora 17:43, 18 May 2005 (UTC) reply

Can't take all credit; the thinking behind it came from an outline Grenavitar ( talkcontribs) had on his (her?) page as a To Do item for a while. I took that and expanded it. iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 19:41, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

NIce work guys . but Gospel of Barnabas ?? I know its relevence with islamic view of Jesus ... but then ... dont U think its not a part of Islamic texts Farhansher 21:10, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply

I admit I know nothing of the text, but on the wiki page for Gospel of Barnabas it seems to imply, under the Islamic perspective section, that some scholars deem it authentic. Perhaps apocrypha is not the best title. Am I misunderstanding the page's explanation? freestylefrappe 00:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

Good start, IFaqeer! Zora 17:43, 18 May 2005 (UTC) reply

Can't take all credit; the thinking behind it came from an outline Grenavitar ( talkcontribs) had on his (her?) page as a To Do item for a while. I took that and expanded it. iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 19:41, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

NIce work guys . but Gospel of Barnabas ?? I know its relevence with islamic view of Jesus ... but then ... dont U think its not a part of Islamic texts Farhansher 21:10, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply

I admit I know nothing of the text, but on the wiki page for Gospel of Barnabas it seems to imply, under the Islamic perspective section, that some scholars deem it authentic. Perhaps apocrypha is not the best title. Am I misunderstanding the page's explanation? freestylefrappe 00:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook