![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors page were merged into List of Intel Pentium processors on 2014-03-14. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I don't think something like a Pentium microarchitecture exists, so we shouldn't need a list of them ;-). The original Pentium (P5) had its own microarchitecture, everything after that had a microarchitecture that was shared with at least Celeron and Xeon processors. I started the list as an overview of all the previous models, and as a place to list the current Pentium models that are no longer called Pentium Dual-Core. The single processors have now been moved (incorrectly) to List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors, including the single-core models and the Nehalem based G6950 that is not at really related to the earlier ones with the Dual-Core name! Since this article is complementary to what is currently named Pentium (brand), I really think the two should be named appropriately. I can see two ways to improve the current situation:
Arndbergmann ( talk) 11:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Instead of grouping the chips by number of cores and target market, I'd vote for a layout similar to List of Intel Xeon microprocessors. I think this will be less confusing because the P5 and Core/Nehalem microarchitectures are extremely different. I'd also suggest doing the same for List of Intel Celeron microprocessors, but that is another story. Arndbergmann ( talk) 15:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
No offence, but this is not make sense to merge quite different architectures, i suggests to move list of Core/Nahalem to "Pentium since Core microarch" or to create two separate articles: Pentium (Core based), Pentium (Nahalem based). Ravbr ( talk) 19:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
OK, You're right, i propose to merge all articles which contain a lists of Pentium processors in a single article, as someone has already done Yesterday, but instead referers to other articles, insert the content of these articles, and eliminate those.
To
Arndbergmann (
talk) --> I think the layout, which makes sense in the
List of Intel Xeon microprocessors, which contains only the server processors, there is no point in the
List of Intel Pentium microprocessors or
List of Intel Celeron microprocessors because this list includes desktop processors as well as mobile.
When you need a processor, the first thing to know is the type of processor: mobile or desktop. When you go to the store to buy a processor, decides to buy a Core-based for example, then you're wondering whether to buy a desktop or mobile. I think the opposite. First, you decide to buy a desktop processor, then then you think "Core or Nahalem".
I'm wathing this article and i think this layout is quite messy(no offence), I'd vote for the layout, the top-level category is a target market, the second category is a micro-architecture, the third category is the number of cores. As well the same for
List of Intel Celeron microprocessors.
--
Ravbr (
talk)
10:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
What is the deal with the 1st-gen Pentium names, such as "Pentium 510\60"? It does not explain where the "510" comes from -- I've always seen them named 60, 66, etc. If it's something internal to Intel, it doesn't belong there (names should be publicly known). -- Vossanova o< 19:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
According to cpu-world.com (e.g., link, link), Haswell Pentiums do not support FMA3. I am going to update the article; if someone has better source, feel free to correct please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmpxchg8b ( talk • contribs) 03:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I've seen other Gladden processors under embedded rather than server, namely on the Celeron list page. -- Azul120 ( talk) 18:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
within the list I'm missing the E6500, which is installed inside a remarkable number of e-learning and kiosk terminals in Germany and South East Europe. Details can be found here: ark.intel.com / products/42805 / intel-pentium-processor-e6500. Not only I own such a CPU, I also have been part of some projects to ship brands of those terminals ("Skeye.Vision" alias "skeye vision touch", HW2222 a.s.o.).
I don't dare to add this CPU to the wiki page. Can somebody? -- 2A02:8108:8080:1F4B:839:AE83:ED65:BD82 ( talk) 11:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Tremont-based Celeron and Pentium Silver CPUs have an L3 memory cache. Even though this is listed in the source code of the tables, the template doesn't support the l3 parameter. This needs to be fixed. I don't know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Technorj ( talk • contribs) 16:41, April 9, 2021 (UTC)
@ Evelyn Marie It being a list class article doesn't mean there aren't guidelines the article has to follow. The article in its current state is in need of help— prices need to be removed, all of the in-line external links need to be removed, many parts of the article are written unencyclopedically, etc. I ask you to please self-revert until those issues are addressed. :3 F4U ( they /it) 15:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors page were merged into List of Intel Pentium processors on 2014-03-14. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I don't think something like a Pentium microarchitecture exists, so we shouldn't need a list of them ;-). The original Pentium (P5) had its own microarchitecture, everything after that had a microarchitecture that was shared with at least Celeron and Xeon processors. I started the list as an overview of all the previous models, and as a place to list the current Pentium models that are no longer called Pentium Dual-Core. The single processors have now been moved (incorrectly) to List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors, including the single-core models and the Nehalem based G6950 that is not at really related to the earlier ones with the Dual-Core name! Since this article is complementary to what is currently named Pentium (brand), I really think the two should be named appropriately. I can see two ways to improve the current situation:
Arndbergmann ( talk) 11:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Instead of grouping the chips by number of cores and target market, I'd vote for a layout similar to List of Intel Xeon microprocessors. I think this will be less confusing because the P5 and Core/Nehalem microarchitectures are extremely different. I'd also suggest doing the same for List of Intel Celeron microprocessors, but that is another story. Arndbergmann ( talk) 15:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
No offence, but this is not make sense to merge quite different architectures, i suggests to move list of Core/Nahalem to "Pentium since Core microarch" or to create two separate articles: Pentium (Core based), Pentium (Nahalem based). Ravbr ( talk) 19:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
OK, You're right, i propose to merge all articles which contain a lists of Pentium processors in a single article, as someone has already done Yesterday, but instead referers to other articles, insert the content of these articles, and eliminate those.
To
Arndbergmann (
talk) --> I think the layout, which makes sense in the
List of Intel Xeon microprocessors, which contains only the server processors, there is no point in the
List of Intel Pentium microprocessors or
List of Intel Celeron microprocessors because this list includes desktop processors as well as mobile.
When you need a processor, the first thing to know is the type of processor: mobile or desktop. When you go to the store to buy a processor, decides to buy a Core-based for example, then you're wondering whether to buy a desktop or mobile. I think the opposite. First, you decide to buy a desktop processor, then then you think "Core or Nahalem".
I'm wathing this article and i think this layout is quite messy(no offence), I'd vote for the layout, the top-level category is a target market, the second category is a micro-architecture, the third category is the number of cores. As well the same for
List of Intel Celeron microprocessors.
--
Ravbr (
talk)
10:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
What is the deal with the 1st-gen Pentium names, such as "Pentium 510\60"? It does not explain where the "510" comes from -- I've always seen them named 60, 66, etc. If it's something internal to Intel, it doesn't belong there (names should be publicly known). -- Vossanova o< 19:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
According to cpu-world.com (e.g., link, link), Haswell Pentiums do not support FMA3. I am going to update the article; if someone has better source, feel free to correct please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmpxchg8b ( talk • contribs) 03:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
I've seen other Gladden processors under embedded rather than server, namely on the Celeron list page. -- Azul120 ( talk) 18:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
within the list I'm missing the E6500, which is installed inside a remarkable number of e-learning and kiosk terminals in Germany and South East Europe. Details can be found here: ark.intel.com / products/42805 / intel-pentium-processor-e6500. Not only I own such a CPU, I also have been part of some projects to ship brands of those terminals ("Skeye.Vision" alias "skeye vision touch", HW2222 a.s.o.).
I don't dare to add this CPU to the wiki page. Can somebody? -- 2A02:8108:8080:1F4B:839:AE83:ED65:BD82 ( talk) 11:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Tremont-based Celeron and Pentium Silver CPUs have an L3 memory cache. Even though this is listed in the source code of the tables, the template doesn't support the l3 parameter. This needs to be fixed. I don't know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Technorj ( talk • contribs) 16:41, April 9, 2021 (UTC)
@ Evelyn Marie It being a list class article doesn't mean there aren't guidelines the article has to follow. The article in its current state is in need of help— prices need to be removed, all of the in-line external links need to be removed, many parts of the article are written unencyclopedically, etc. I ask you to please self-revert until those issues are addressed. :3 F4U ( they /it) 15:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)