This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've added the HEX numbers so that it is easier for programmers to look up their protocols. The List is far away from any main path, so it should not bother the normal surfer. If you have any suggestions, please write it here. And please do not delete the HEX values. Musterstudent ( talk) 13:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
What does the occurrence have to do with anything? SurDin ( talk) 15:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
...Why is the name of this article esentially 'Internet Protocol protocol numbers'? Am I missing something here? Jguy Talk Done 17:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Protocol 4 is currently listed like this:
Decimal | Hex | Keyword | Protocol | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 0x04 | IP | IP in IP (encapsulation) | RFC 2003 |
RFC2003 defines IPv4 tunneled in IPv4. (the iana website also refers to RFC2003 in it's list). However it depend on where the number 4 is used which tunneling protocol is used. If it is in a IPv4 packet, IP in IP is probably the correct link. But in a IPv6 packet, it should link to 4in6. And in a Authentication Headers (AH) or Encapsulating Security Payloads (ESP) it should link to IPsec.
So I think it is better to just call it IPv4 and refer to RFC791. (compare this to protocol 41 - which links to IPv6 and not 6in4 or any other encapsulation protocol):
Decimal | Hex | Keyword | Protocol | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
41 | 0x29 | IPv6 | IPv6 (encapsulation) | RFC 2473, RFC 3056 |
-- wimmel ( talk) 16:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
It would be helpful to know which of these protocol numbers became obsolete. I suggest to add a column Obsolete with the date or the RFC that made them obsolete. Theking2 ( talk) 09:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
This list does not appear to provide any encyclopedic value compared to the list published by IANA. I'm tempted to WP:PROD it to save us the hassle of maintaining it. ~ KvnG 17:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of IP protocol numbers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Protocols 50 and 51 are, collectively, IPsec.
Would anyone object if I changed:
0x32 50 ESP Encapsulating Security Payload RFC 4303 0x33 51 AH Authentication Header RFC 4302
To:
0x32 50 ESP Encapsulating Security Payload (IPsec) RFC 4303 0x33 51 AH Authentication Header (IPsec) RFC 4302
Regards, Ben Aveling 00:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Protocol 84 no longer needs to be listed twice. Sallersanyi ( talk) 05:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've added the HEX numbers so that it is easier for programmers to look up their protocols. The List is far away from any main path, so it should not bother the normal surfer. If you have any suggestions, please write it here. And please do not delete the HEX values. Musterstudent ( talk) 13:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
What does the occurrence have to do with anything? SurDin ( talk) 15:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
...Why is the name of this article esentially 'Internet Protocol protocol numbers'? Am I missing something here? Jguy Talk Done 17:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Protocol 4 is currently listed like this:
Decimal | Hex | Keyword | Protocol | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 0x04 | IP | IP in IP (encapsulation) | RFC 2003 |
RFC2003 defines IPv4 tunneled in IPv4. (the iana website also refers to RFC2003 in it's list). However it depend on where the number 4 is used which tunneling protocol is used. If it is in a IPv4 packet, IP in IP is probably the correct link. But in a IPv6 packet, it should link to 4in6. And in a Authentication Headers (AH) or Encapsulating Security Payloads (ESP) it should link to IPsec.
So I think it is better to just call it IPv4 and refer to RFC791. (compare this to protocol 41 - which links to IPv6 and not 6in4 or any other encapsulation protocol):
Decimal | Hex | Keyword | Protocol | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
41 | 0x29 | IPv6 | IPv6 (encapsulation) | RFC 2473, RFC 3056 |
-- wimmel ( talk) 16:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
It would be helpful to know which of these protocol numbers became obsolete. I suggest to add a column Obsolete with the date or the RFC that made them obsolete. Theking2 ( talk) 09:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
This list does not appear to provide any encyclopedic value compared to the list published by IANA. I'm tempted to WP:PROD it to save us the hassle of maintaining it. ~ KvnG 17:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of IP protocol numbers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Protocols 50 and 51 are, collectively, IPsec.
Would anyone object if I changed:
0x32 50 ESP Encapsulating Security Payload RFC 4303 0x33 51 AH Authentication Header RFC 4302
To:
0x32 50 ESP Encapsulating Security Payload (IPsec) RFC 4303 0x33 51 AH Authentication Header (IPsec) RFC 4302
Regards, Ben Aveling 00:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Protocol 84 no longer needs to be listed twice. Sallersanyi ( talk) 05:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)