This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a reason that women artists of the Hudson River School are treated of in a separate paragraph rather than being integrated with the rest of the list? It seems it would be enough to acknowledge in a paragraph the reality that their careers in general developed differently because they did not have the same access to training or exhibitions, but otherwise include them in the list by generation in parallel with their male counterparts. Alafarge ( talk) 02:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
The main Hudson River School only mentions the founder (and his friend), and a second generation. This list, however, breaks them up into first, second, and third generations. What is the basis for that? I've never seen any reliable articles or books on the topic that do this splitting by "generation" (not saying they don't exist, just that I've never seen any that do it). The diff when this split occurred referenced this book on the Civil War period that lists a handful (13) of the artists on this page and splits them into a second and third generation of the school. However, that's the only place I've found this splitting into generations. Unless we can support (via reliable sources about this topic) this division of the artists into generations in the main article, I think this list needs to be merged back into a single list. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Well that's embarrassing! After "diff" I must have skipped the detail of that sentence, thinking it was all diffs!
OK, so two of us probably agree that, even if there is general scholarly support for three generations of HRS painters,
Some recent edits have expressed concern that not everyone on the list is actually considered part of the Hudson River School. I think it would be good to add at least one reference for every entry that supports the artist being on this page. As most of them have articles, it should be as easy as copying over a reference from the article. For others, it might take some work. In the end, though, having the references here will only strengthen the list. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a reason that women artists of the Hudson River School are treated of in a separate paragraph rather than being integrated with the rest of the list? It seems it would be enough to acknowledge in a paragraph the reality that their careers in general developed differently because they did not have the same access to training or exhibitions, but otherwise include them in the list by generation in parallel with their male counterparts. Alafarge ( talk) 02:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
The main Hudson River School only mentions the founder (and his friend), and a second generation. This list, however, breaks them up into first, second, and third generations. What is the basis for that? I've never seen any reliable articles or books on the topic that do this splitting by "generation" (not saying they don't exist, just that I've never seen any that do it). The diff when this split occurred referenced this book on the Civil War period that lists a handful (13) of the artists on this page and splits them into a second and third generation of the school. However, that's the only place I've found this splitting into generations. Unless we can support (via reliable sources about this topic) this division of the artists into generations in the main article, I think this list needs to be merged back into a single list. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Well that's embarrassing! After "diff" I must have skipped the detail of that sentence, thinking it was all diffs!
OK, so two of us probably agree that, even if there is general scholarly support for three generations of HRS painters,
Some recent edits have expressed concern that not everyone on the list is actually considered part of the Hudson River School. I think it would be good to add at least one reference for every entry that supports the artist being on this page. As most of them have articles, it should be as easy as copying over a reference from the article. For others, it might take some work. In the end, though, having the references here will only strengthen the list. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)