This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As E20 primarily works as a stand-alone series that can be watched at any time, and as there are only 12 episodes, should we really put dates for the first and last appearances in the infobox for the four characters from E20, or put first as episode 1 and last as episode 12? I think we should kind of treat it as a non-soap and use episode names like any other show does with names for its episodes. AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 01:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Just like Ryan, who was credited as "Man", there is a mystery girl joining soon, played by Brittany Papple and credited as "Little Girl". She's going to turn up looking for her father, and Ronnie is going to be shocked to find out who the father is. The Daily Star are saying she's a Mitchell. She could be Louise but I don't think so, and if she's not, what should we do about her here? I was really hoping for all sections on this page to have OOU information and any that don't just put them in others, but she might turn out to be significant. Apparently we find out before any character does who she is, so that's good at least. anemoneprojectors talk 10:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
As we now know, Santer and Kirkwood will share the EP credit for two weeks. Vanessa is apparently appearing in the first join episode, so should the introducer therefore be both Santer and Kirkwood? Anemone Projectors 01:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I think we can get some OOU for Jade, who's appearing next week. Originally meant to be a prostitute, scenes are being reshot to drop the prostitute reference. It won't be much OOU but could we give her her own section because of it? Anemone Projectors 23:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to start a discussion on this. I've been commenting out infoboxes where the section containing them is very short, in order to reduce whitespace in the article. I was going to go through all the older articles and comment out a load more for the sake of whitespace but as yet I haven't got around to it (I only did 2009). I also did it if the infobox only contained basic information that could easily be included in prose - always making sure that it is mentioned in prose. Anyway my question is should Grace and Jodie have visible infoboxes even though at the moment there would be a large whitespace in both sections, since they have more than just "basic information" (i.e a family section, etc)? Anemone Projectors 19:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Surely Stacey's baby should be given an infobox? The amount of family she will have... Alex250P ( talk) 18:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Aha, another EastEnders birth and I'm back with the same question. Shouldn't Richard Mitchell be given an infobox? As even though he is a week old the storyline of his adoption takes some turns next week (I read the spoilers) and we'll need to add some information, surely thats enough for an infobox? 90.199.5.246 ( talk) 18:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't sign in to post that ^ Alex250P ( talk) 18:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough, although I think we should re-define what characters we include and not. As Richard will most likely become a 'major' character. I thought the old system worked well. Maybe full-time cast members (like character's kids) with infoboxes and the like, and only minor characters (few episodes only) in the 'others' section? Alex250P ( talk) 22:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I just realised that Judy Browne played a social worker called Maria Leys in 2008 but appeared today as a social worker called Maria de Costa. So we think they are the same person and they forgot she had a last name? Should we merge Maria de Costa with Maria Leys? Anemone Projectors 19:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
This ref says the character was originally going to be called Grace, it's from Thomas' agency.. here.. Any point? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 18:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Ooh when I was looking for confirmation of Jodie's first episode just now I found this that says "With Mercy leaving for Nigeria, Fatboy is gutted. He learns that Pearl is only leaving because she thinks Mercy wants to and vice versa" but then credits her as Grace. That's from the BBC. I guess they write the synopsis before transmission and upload it after, and as her name wasn't really mentioned at the time they must have changed it during filming. Anemone Projectors 20:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't Michael Moon be a second cousin to Alfie? Alfie's father didn't have any brothers as Alfie's grandfather died in the war and only fathered Alfie's father. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.246.251 ( talk) 11:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
What explanation are they going to give? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.246.251 ( talk) 17:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Michael's page on the official site says he's a second cousin, so I guess they said cousin as you might call your second cousin your cousin, because it's still a type of cousin... Anemone Projectors 23:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Should he be classified as Present; regular (departing) because he is only going to be on screen for a bit longer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.3.102 ( talk) 23:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Should Greg Jessop be split off know as he has 10 references but i do have one objection to him being split off and that is that his storylines part arent to long.-- MayhemMario ( talk) 13:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I've made changes to this table per the new guidelines for tables relating to WP:ACCESS, but I wanted to propose changing it to a definition list. It would mean that...
Character | Date(s) | Actor | Circumstances |
---|---|---|---|
Fatima Inzamam | 1 January | (uncredited) | Wife of Inzamam Ahmed and mother of Jamila and Ali. She appears before Syed Masood's wedding to Amira Shah but leaves when Inzamam's brother Masood Ahmed tells Inzamam he is no longer welcome at the wedding.[1] |
Emma West | 14–15 January | Ellie Beavan[2] | Archie Mitchell's solicitor.[3] She arrives for the reading of Archie's will, but her paperwork gets dropped and blows around the Square. When Archie's second wife Peggy finds out that Archie divorced his first wife Glenda, Glenda denies it but Emma confirms that this would be possible even without Glenda's signature. Before she leaves, Billy Mitchell invites her to come back for a drink any time she wants. |
would become something like....
Any thoughts? Anemone Projectors 18:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Ive always thought the way that these three characters were lumped together on here was clumsy, but surely now Connor at least should be listed on his own? His storylines have stretched past Billy's gang connections and death, and he's had a lot more action/dialogue than other characters that have been listed on here. Anyone agree? Bleaney ( talk) 21:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Done Anemone Projectors 23:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Where have they gone?! are they coming back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.14.237 ( talk) 00:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, Tommy Moon and James Branning are the only characters left to be added here. As I'm sure we all know, one of them isn't going to last long and then the names will effectively swap over. How are we going to deal with this? Anemone Projectors 16:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Should we even swap them, as we already know that they are who they are, the just get switched. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.14.237 ( talk) 01:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Here's a couple more sources: [2] [3] Anemone Projectors 01:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
should is still be listed as a regular character, he hasn't appeared for ages now and it doesn't look like he'll be appearing again?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustbeemo789 ( talk • contribs) 09:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
We don't know for sure, so he still should remain as present. But there has been a discussion in the past about him being classified as a regular, where he seems to be more of a recurring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.14.237 ( talk) 02:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't the man who kissed Christian Clarke on New Years Eve be included in the 'others' section of this list? I'd add him myself, but cant remember his name (if he had one!) Bleaney ( talk) 16:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Jodie's section is getting pretty big and she has quite a bit of storyline. Should we? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.33.132.13 ( talk) 03:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Lorna appeared in 1991, as a love interest for Mark Fowler. The source that says she appeared in 1997 is wrong, but this information seems to have been picked up by a couple of other places as well (Digital Spy, Female First). Please stop reverting to the wrong information. I have seen her in 1991 episodes, and walford.net lists her as appearing in 1991 (their character profiles only go up to 1991, are never wrong and have been used as sources by WPEE before). I can't get a link to her profile on there but if you search for her you will see. 144.124.121.55 ( talk) 19:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you think with have enough information and referneces to split off Michael Moon? Ive counted 10 overall i think thats enough, if not could we please replace that pictrue of him which was deleted?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 21:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I think that we should move Yusef to the regular charters as he has had a proper picture for the website see: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s2/eastenders/spoilers/a303087/yusef-provides-support-for-denise.html-- MayhemMario ( talk) 14:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
i remember we did have a picture of michael but i got deleted, can it be restored?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 12:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Danny Mitchell
1. Storylines (tick) 2. Referneces (tick)
I dont see there any reason ,apart from that he has left, at why he cannot be split off he has 12 refernces thats enough?! Do you agree?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 16:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD I am discussing this instead of trying to explain in an edit summary while I make another revert. Firstly, I don't think TV Scoop is a reliable source (although it should really be Mario starting this because it's Bold, Revert, Discuss; not Bold, Revert, Revert). Second, "Carol doesn't really mean anything by it, but she makes a comment about Dot’s relationship with Edward that really stings" is about Carol and Dot, not Edward, and doesn't seem relevant here (plus is in-universe info, if it is important it can go with the storyline). "Dot thinks Carol is implying there is something inappropriate about their friendship, and she's outraged and humiliated" is already covered by "Dot [...] is mortified when [Carol] calls him her 'fancy man' and is worried that other people will think they are more than friends." – Anemone Projectors– 21:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
James branning was listed as being half sibling of amy mitchell, however as ronnie and roxy are sisters, this would make them threee-quarter cousins. See http://www.genetic-genealogy.co.uk/Toc115570138.html#Sib_Relationships for clarification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.181.244 ( talk) 20:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
I like the new version GSorby has downloaded not the old one,can we change it? Mayhem Mario
Well no. Rob's can be deleted, he will never get his own article. I've removed Grace's image and added a hidden note. Cora will probably get her own article, as so will Greg. Lydia can probably go, but one image won't hurt. GSorby - Talk! 16:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
In my opinion, yes I think we will be okay with major characters, GSorby - Talk! 21:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Okay i'm pretty sure we've talked about this before bu here it goes, in the The Stage bought by AP, it says 'it was revealed that Mercy's family will remain in the series' which means Grace is staying. I.M.O. a recurring/regualr character doesnt normally last that long, if you get what i mean, i knwo she has hardly appeared, i just think she should be a regualr only on the source. Mayhem Mario 17:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Done- Mayhem Mario 15:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Yusef seems notable enough for his own article now, and he is also a regular character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalfEnergy ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Done
Yeah hi, I can see this has already been disputed here but I'd like to make it clear that when Dot wanted to fix Heather's wedding dress, she mentioned that Mrs Ollibumi had borrowed her sewing machine and they retrive it from her, though she did not appear it is clear she still lives in walford, and can not be considered a former character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.11.174 ( talk) 16:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
At present, James Branning and Tommy Moon have a joint entry on this list. While I think this was a good layout for the characters when the baby swap storyline and its aftermath were played out, I now wonder if it would be better to split them so they have separate entries.
Essentially James Branning's storylines are over, and it's unlikely that much more will be added to the entry concerning him. However, with Tommy it is probable and likely that storylines for the character will develop, as hopefully will any development information. I appreciate that not much has happened with Tommy since the baby-swap storyline, but i'm sure it will as long as his parents still appear in EastEnders.
I also acknowledge that any split would be problematic for the development section, as it could mean some duplication for the new entries. I'm prepared to have a go at it myself if people agree on here that a split would be desirable, though i'm sure there are other editors on here who would be better at the task. Any way, what do people think? Bleaney ( talk) 01:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
It's obvious she has left EastEnders, as she has not appeared for a year, one of BK's many mistakes..., but how are we going to finish her storylines? It cant be "Grace slapped her and tells her to leave". — M.Mario ( T/ C) 14:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi this name character is a bit confusing, he is credited as Tasha's Dad,
it mentions in the BBC blog, his name is Joesph
but in the below clip of the episode at 1:20, he says his name is Voldar.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p007g0c2
Should we put Joseph/Voldar or just leave it at Joseph?
Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 02:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
@ AnemoneProjectors: Hi yeah sorry I forgot to mention about the spelling of the name, just noticed I didn't mention it. I wonder why its says Joseph on the BBC blog. I will put a note of Joseph noting he was credited as Tasha's Dad as you suggested. I will also have a look for the spelling. Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 15:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
@ AnemoneProjectors: I have done just that, I posted the question on a Polish forum
https://polishforums.com/language/spelling-name-80376/
the consensus is mixed by two people did mention the name you did "Wałdoch/valdokh"
Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 23:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
@ AnemoneProjectors: I came across it by chance, I vaguely remembered seeing the clip a few years ago, when I was scrolling through the old catch-up clips. I then remember about it yesterday and managed to locate the video. Lucky I remembered. Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 00:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of EastEnders characters (1985) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As E20 primarily works as a stand-alone series that can be watched at any time, and as there are only 12 episodes, should we really put dates for the first and last appearances in the infobox for the four characters from E20, or put first as episode 1 and last as episode 12? I think we should kind of treat it as a non-soap and use episode names like any other show does with names for its episodes. AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 01:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Just like Ryan, who was credited as "Man", there is a mystery girl joining soon, played by Brittany Papple and credited as "Little Girl". She's going to turn up looking for her father, and Ronnie is going to be shocked to find out who the father is. The Daily Star are saying she's a Mitchell. She could be Louise but I don't think so, and if she's not, what should we do about her here? I was really hoping for all sections on this page to have OOU information and any that don't just put them in others, but she might turn out to be significant. Apparently we find out before any character does who she is, so that's good at least. anemoneprojectors talk 10:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
As we now know, Santer and Kirkwood will share the EP credit for two weeks. Vanessa is apparently appearing in the first join episode, so should the introducer therefore be both Santer and Kirkwood? Anemone Projectors 01:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I think we can get some OOU for Jade, who's appearing next week. Originally meant to be a prostitute, scenes are being reshot to drop the prostitute reference. It won't be much OOU but could we give her her own section because of it? Anemone Projectors 23:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to start a discussion on this. I've been commenting out infoboxes where the section containing them is very short, in order to reduce whitespace in the article. I was going to go through all the older articles and comment out a load more for the sake of whitespace but as yet I haven't got around to it (I only did 2009). I also did it if the infobox only contained basic information that could easily be included in prose - always making sure that it is mentioned in prose. Anyway my question is should Grace and Jodie have visible infoboxes even though at the moment there would be a large whitespace in both sections, since they have more than just "basic information" (i.e a family section, etc)? Anemone Projectors 19:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Surely Stacey's baby should be given an infobox? The amount of family she will have... Alex250P ( talk) 18:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Aha, another EastEnders birth and I'm back with the same question. Shouldn't Richard Mitchell be given an infobox? As even though he is a week old the storyline of his adoption takes some turns next week (I read the spoilers) and we'll need to add some information, surely thats enough for an infobox? 90.199.5.246 ( talk) 18:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't sign in to post that ^ Alex250P ( talk) 18:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough, although I think we should re-define what characters we include and not. As Richard will most likely become a 'major' character. I thought the old system worked well. Maybe full-time cast members (like character's kids) with infoboxes and the like, and only minor characters (few episodes only) in the 'others' section? Alex250P ( talk) 22:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I just realised that Judy Browne played a social worker called Maria Leys in 2008 but appeared today as a social worker called Maria de Costa. So we think they are the same person and they forgot she had a last name? Should we merge Maria de Costa with Maria Leys? Anemone Projectors 19:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
This ref says the character was originally going to be called Grace, it's from Thomas' agency.. here.. Any point? RAIN..the..ONE HOTLINE 18:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Ooh when I was looking for confirmation of Jodie's first episode just now I found this that says "With Mercy leaving for Nigeria, Fatboy is gutted. He learns that Pearl is only leaving because she thinks Mercy wants to and vice versa" but then credits her as Grace. That's from the BBC. I guess they write the synopsis before transmission and upload it after, and as her name wasn't really mentioned at the time they must have changed it during filming. Anemone Projectors 20:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't Michael Moon be a second cousin to Alfie? Alfie's father didn't have any brothers as Alfie's grandfather died in the war and only fathered Alfie's father. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.246.251 ( talk) 11:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
What explanation are they going to give? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.246.251 ( talk) 17:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Michael's page on the official site says he's a second cousin, so I guess they said cousin as you might call your second cousin your cousin, because it's still a type of cousin... Anemone Projectors 23:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Should he be classified as Present; regular (departing) because he is only going to be on screen for a bit longer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.3.102 ( talk) 23:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Should Greg Jessop be split off know as he has 10 references but i do have one objection to him being split off and that is that his storylines part arent to long.-- MayhemMario ( talk) 13:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I've made changes to this table per the new guidelines for tables relating to WP:ACCESS, but I wanted to propose changing it to a definition list. It would mean that...
Character | Date(s) | Actor | Circumstances |
---|---|---|---|
Fatima Inzamam | 1 January | (uncredited) | Wife of Inzamam Ahmed and mother of Jamila and Ali. She appears before Syed Masood's wedding to Amira Shah but leaves when Inzamam's brother Masood Ahmed tells Inzamam he is no longer welcome at the wedding.[1] |
Emma West | 14–15 January | Ellie Beavan[2] | Archie Mitchell's solicitor.[3] She arrives for the reading of Archie's will, but her paperwork gets dropped and blows around the Square. When Archie's second wife Peggy finds out that Archie divorced his first wife Glenda, Glenda denies it but Emma confirms that this would be possible even without Glenda's signature. Before she leaves, Billy Mitchell invites her to come back for a drink any time she wants. |
would become something like....
Any thoughts? Anemone Projectors 18:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Ive always thought the way that these three characters were lumped together on here was clumsy, but surely now Connor at least should be listed on his own? His storylines have stretched past Billy's gang connections and death, and he's had a lot more action/dialogue than other characters that have been listed on here. Anyone agree? Bleaney ( talk) 21:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Done Anemone Projectors 23:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Where have they gone?! are they coming back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.14.237 ( talk) 00:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, Tommy Moon and James Branning are the only characters left to be added here. As I'm sure we all know, one of them isn't going to last long and then the names will effectively swap over. How are we going to deal with this? Anemone Projectors 16:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Should we even swap them, as we already know that they are who they are, the just get switched. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.14.237 ( talk) 01:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Here's a couple more sources: [2] [3] Anemone Projectors 01:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
should is still be listed as a regular character, he hasn't appeared for ages now and it doesn't look like he'll be appearing again?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustbeemo789 ( talk • contribs) 09:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
We don't know for sure, so he still should remain as present. But there has been a discussion in the past about him being classified as a regular, where he seems to be more of a recurring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.14.237 ( talk) 02:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't the man who kissed Christian Clarke on New Years Eve be included in the 'others' section of this list? I'd add him myself, but cant remember his name (if he had one!) Bleaney ( talk) 16:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Jodie's section is getting pretty big and she has quite a bit of storyline. Should we? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.33.132.13 ( talk) 03:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Lorna appeared in 1991, as a love interest for Mark Fowler. The source that says she appeared in 1997 is wrong, but this information seems to have been picked up by a couple of other places as well (Digital Spy, Female First). Please stop reverting to the wrong information. I have seen her in 1991 episodes, and walford.net lists her as appearing in 1991 (their character profiles only go up to 1991, are never wrong and have been used as sources by WPEE before). I can't get a link to her profile on there but if you search for her you will see. 144.124.121.55 ( talk) 19:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you think with have enough information and referneces to split off Michael Moon? Ive counted 10 overall i think thats enough, if not could we please replace that pictrue of him which was deleted?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 21:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I think that we should move Yusef to the regular charters as he has had a proper picture for the website see: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s2/eastenders/spoilers/a303087/yusef-provides-support-for-denise.html-- MayhemMario ( talk) 14:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Done User:MayhemMario 12:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
i remember we did have a picture of michael but i got deleted, can it be restored?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 12:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Danny Mitchell
1. Storylines (tick) 2. Referneces (tick)
I dont see there any reason ,apart from that he has left, at why he cannot be split off he has 12 refernces thats enough?! Do you agree?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 16:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD I am discussing this instead of trying to explain in an edit summary while I make another revert. Firstly, I don't think TV Scoop is a reliable source (although it should really be Mario starting this because it's Bold, Revert, Discuss; not Bold, Revert, Revert). Second, "Carol doesn't really mean anything by it, but she makes a comment about Dot’s relationship with Edward that really stings" is about Carol and Dot, not Edward, and doesn't seem relevant here (plus is in-universe info, if it is important it can go with the storyline). "Dot thinks Carol is implying there is something inappropriate about their friendship, and she's outraged and humiliated" is already covered by "Dot [...] is mortified when [Carol] calls him her 'fancy man' and is worried that other people will think they are more than friends." – Anemone Projectors– 21:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
James branning was listed as being half sibling of amy mitchell, however as ronnie and roxy are sisters, this would make them threee-quarter cousins. See http://www.genetic-genealogy.co.uk/Toc115570138.html#Sib_Relationships for clarification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.181.244 ( talk) 20:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
I like the new version GSorby has downloaded not the old one,can we change it? Mayhem Mario
Well no. Rob's can be deleted, he will never get his own article. I've removed Grace's image and added a hidden note. Cora will probably get her own article, as so will Greg. Lydia can probably go, but one image won't hurt. GSorby - Talk! 16:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
In my opinion, yes I think we will be okay with major characters, GSorby - Talk! 21:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Okay i'm pretty sure we've talked about this before bu here it goes, in the The Stage bought by AP, it says 'it was revealed that Mercy's family will remain in the series' which means Grace is staying. I.M.O. a recurring/regualr character doesnt normally last that long, if you get what i mean, i knwo she has hardly appeared, i just think she should be a regualr only on the source. Mayhem Mario 17:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Done- Mayhem Mario 15:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Yusef seems notable enough for his own article now, and he is also a regular character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalfEnergy ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Done
Yeah hi, I can see this has already been disputed here but I'd like to make it clear that when Dot wanted to fix Heather's wedding dress, she mentioned that Mrs Ollibumi had borrowed her sewing machine and they retrive it from her, though she did not appear it is clear she still lives in walford, and can not be considered a former character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.11.174 ( talk) 16:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
At present, James Branning and Tommy Moon have a joint entry on this list. While I think this was a good layout for the characters when the baby swap storyline and its aftermath were played out, I now wonder if it would be better to split them so they have separate entries.
Essentially James Branning's storylines are over, and it's unlikely that much more will be added to the entry concerning him. However, with Tommy it is probable and likely that storylines for the character will develop, as hopefully will any development information. I appreciate that not much has happened with Tommy since the baby-swap storyline, but i'm sure it will as long as his parents still appear in EastEnders.
I also acknowledge that any split would be problematic for the development section, as it could mean some duplication for the new entries. I'm prepared to have a go at it myself if people agree on here that a split would be desirable, though i'm sure there are other editors on here who would be better at the task. Any way, what do people think? Bleaney ( talk) 01:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
It's obvious she has left EastEnders, as she has not appeared for a year, one of BK's many mistakes..., but how are we going to finish her storylines? It cant be "Grace slapped her and tells her to leave". — M.Mario ( T/ C) 14:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi this name character is a bit confusing, he is credited as Tasha's Dad,
it mentions in the BBC blog, his name is Joesph
but in the below clip of the episode at 1:20, he says his name is Voldar.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p007g0c2
Should we put Joseph/Voldar or just leave it at Joseph?
Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 02:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
@ AnemoneProjectors: Hi yeah sorry I forgot to mention about the spelling of the name, just noticed I didn't mention it. I wonder why its says Joseph on the BBC blog. I will put a note of Joseph noting he was credited as Tasha's Dad as you suggested. I will also have a look for the spelling. Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 15:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
@ AnemoneProjectors: I have done just that, I posted the question on a Polish forum
https://polishforums.com/language/spelling-name-80376/
the consensus is mixed by two people did mention the name you did "Wałdoch/valdokh"
Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 23:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
@ AnemoneProjectors: I came across it by chance, I vaguely remembered seeing the clip a few years ago, when I was scrolling through the old catch-up clips. I then remember about it yesterday and managed to locate the video. Lucky I remembered. Thanks Kelvin 101 ( talk) 00:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of EastEnders characters (1985) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)