This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
H.H. John VIII was missing. This appears to be a mistake as the dates which were attributed to H.H. Theodosius III (ie 1300-1320) are in fact the dates when H.H. John VIII sat upon the throne of St. Mark. I have also written a brief article on Pope John VIII with a source so hopefully Wikipedia will accept it and clarify any confussion. I listed a CD-ROM published by St. Mark Coptic Orthodox Church, Troy, MI, USA as the source but I wasn't entirely sure about how to cite it.
Article duplicate with List of Greek Orthodox Patriarchs of Alexandria. olivier 07:54 26 May 2003 (UTC)
One of links - Peter VII of Alexandria - is not correct to right person. Berasategui 20:10, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
It seems that part of this list is more Arabic than English. Shouldn't Khail be changed to Michael? -- Valentinian 22:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
I have set up the above page for the Roman Catholic Popes to cover the papacy as an organisation. Perhaps there could be an equivalent for the Coptic Papacy (and any other religious leaderships)
Jackiespeel 17:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
why? even the article about the current pope states him being 117th in the line. Gbnogkfs 21 November 2006, 12:12 (UTC)
The numbering goes back to Mark as the first, the list however legitimately (in accordance to the systematic used on WP) only begins with Timothy II. Also numbering creates the silly necessity of indenting restored patriarchs. Str1977 (smile back) 15:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
For the Coptic Papacy, this link will be extremely useful for some of the Coptic Popes. Take a look. [1] ~ Troy 00:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
There is not a valid reference in this article. I put a citation needed banner on the top of the page. Please give valid sources for this information. As it stands now the whole article could be removed as unsourced. There must be a valid list available for Coptic Orthodox Popes in some book. No source equals fiction to a Wiki reader. Jason3777 ( talk) 03:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a bit of trouble understanding what method was used to determine the dates of each Patriarch's years in office. Does the ordination of a competing patriarch (whether Arian or Chalcedonian) really make the original Pope "deposed"? The Cake 2 ( talk) 23:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
That should be a Coptic delta, but it looks like a lambda. -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 17:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Coptic Orthodox Popes of Alexandria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
What is the ground for listing almost all Coptic Orthodox popes as saints? Neither Meinardus (2002) nor Atiya (1991) do... The few ones who aren't listed as saints aren't mentioned to have been hideous popes and I can find that at least one of them is even mentioned in a synaxarium. This seems to have been a completely arbitrary choice by Pope ShenoudaIII (the user, not the actual pope lol). Leefeni aures audiendi audiat 17:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
H.H. John VIII was missing. This appears to be a mistake as the dates which were attributed to H.H. Theodosius III (ie 1300-1320) are in fact the dates when H.H. John VIII sat upon the throne of St. Mark. I have also written a brief article on Pope John VIII with a source so hopefully Wikipedia will accept it and clarify any confussion. I listed a CD-ROM published by St. Mark Coptic Orthodox Church, Troy, MI, USA as the source but I wasn't entirely sure about how to cite it.
Article duplicate with List of Greek Orthodox Patriarchs of Alexandria. olivier 07:54 26 May 2003 (UTC)
One of links - Peter VII of Alexandria - is not correct to right person. Berasategui 20:10, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
It seems that part of this list is more Arabic than English. Shouldn't Khail be changed to Michael? -- Valentinian 22:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
I have set up the above page for the Roman Catholic Popes to cover the papacy as an organisation. Perhaps there could be an equivalent for the Coptic Papacy (and any other religious leaderships)
Jackiespeel 17:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
why? even the article about the current pope states him being 117th in the line. Gbnogkfs 21 November 2006, 12:12 (UTC)
The numbering goes back to Mark as the first, the list however legitimately (in accordance to the systematic used on WP) only begins with Timothy II. Also numbering creates the silly necessity of indenting restored patriarchs. Str1977 (smile back) 15:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
For the Coptic Papacy, this link will be extremely useful for some of the Coptic Popes. Take a look. [1] ~ Troy 00:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
There is not a valid reference in this article. I put a citation needed banner on the top of the page. Please give valid sources for this information. As it stands now the whole article could be removed as unsourced. There must be a valid list available for Coptic Orthodox Popes in some book. No source equals fiction to a Wiki reader. Jason3777 ( talk) 03:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a bit of trouble understanding what method was used to determine the dates of each Patriarch's years in office. Does the ordination of a competing patriarch (whether Arian or Chalcedonian) really make the original Pope "deposed"? The Cake 2 ( talk) 23:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
That should be a Coptic delta, but it looks like a lambda. -- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 17:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Coptic Orthodox Popes of Alexandria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
What is the ground for listing almost all Coptic Orthodox popes as saints? Neither Meinardus (2002) nor Atiya (1991) do... The few ones who aren't listed as saints aren't mentioned to have been hideous popes and I can find that at least one of them is even mentioned in a synaxarium. This seems to have been a completely arbitrary choice by Pope ShenoudaIII (the user, not the actual pope lol). Leefeni aures audiendi audiat 17:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)