This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists List‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It would be better to use the English cover since is is more recognizable and matches the title of the article. [1] ZinnKid ( talk) 06:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply

We usually use the Japanese cover first, English second (yes, I know it probably seems odd when we prefer the English name for the article itself) :P We don't want to ignore the original version completely. In this case, though, you are probably right. I'll get it replaced shortly.-- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 06:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply

OK. Sorry for not signing my post. I know about the "name" thing. (I'm the guy you argued with for the past couple of hours, which was pretty fun even though I lost) Anyways the pic just didn't seem to fit with the big Kanji characters and poor quality. ZinnKid ( talk) 06:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I know, that's why I pointed out the irony ;) The TP pics are better quality. Its hard to get good cover images of the originals for some reason. All fixed now though :) -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 07:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Per one of the employees TP dropped in their recent restructuring, Chibi Vampire's novels are among the many titles that are being canceled. Volume 5, due for release next month, will probably be the last one. However, I'm waiting for a more quotable reliable source, since a forum posting probably doesn't count, and official word on the last volume before updating the list and main article. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 20:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Chibi Vampire: The Novel light novels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080108110321/http://www.tokyopop.com/product/1781/ChibiVampireTheNovel/1.html to http://www.tokyopop.com/product/1781/ChibiVampireTheNovel/1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100325152308/http://www.tokyopop.com/product/1781/ChibiVampireTheNovel/6 to http://www.tokyopop.com/product/1781/ChibiVampireTheNovel/6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply