This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
No need to protect. The page is a fork. The new user King of Babylonia is new in Wikipedia and I understand that he don't know what's been discussed but Taivo have already explained that to him. Redirect. Shmayo ( talk) 08:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Maronites have their own article and are not a part of the ethnic article ( Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people). It's excatly the same content, no need to find excuses to keep it. All Syriac Orthodox, Chaldean Catholic and Nestorian villages are listed. It's clearly a fork. Shmayo ( talk) 11:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This people ethnic article is Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people. Just because it's named Assyrian people after the comon name doesn't meen forks can be created. When it actully is the same people, how can it not be a fork? The "List of Assyrian settlements"-article isn't just for Nestorian villages, it's for the Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people's villages (do read the content in the article!). And, Iraq, you're talking about a different thing. Talk:Assyrian people is open for you if you disagree, but do not make edits before things are discussed here and at Talk:Assyrian people. Shmayo ( talk) 07:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I would prefer it if Chaldeans were not included in the Assyrian people article unless the name is changed to A/C/S people or Syriac people. ܥܝܪܐܩ ( talk) 08:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
No, they are not. If you read discussions here you'll see that most agree on that it's the same people. And the people have one ethnic page, ethnic fork page have been removed. Read earlier discussion and you'll see it's the common name. They compared with other names and the Assyrian was much more used. So of course it's not that page forking anything. This is a new page forking the old already existing one. The people is one, if that's what's been agreed then do not edit against that on other pages, talk in the ethnic page if you have anything against it. Shmayo ( talk) 08:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
ܥܝܪܐܩ, write your comments under please. Talk:Assyrian people is the right place for that, not here. Shmayo ( talk) 08:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Saying it's the same people is very accepted. No, I said that the Assyrian people-article do contain information about the whole people. But if that's what been discussed in the talk page, it doesn't have to be discussed everywhere. If conscious about it was reached, it should be followed. Shmayo ( talk) 09:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Assyrian people is were discussions have been made. It has been as the namning conflict's talk page. Shmayo ( talk) 12:07, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Chaldeans and Assyrians are the same, that's not POV. And if they are the same, this is a fork. Shmayo ( talk) 19:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Haha, how can you even compare German and French with this. Almost everyone agree with that it is the same people. Just because one part of the Nestorian church created an own church (which grew strong first in the 19th century) doesn't mean they now are separate people. Ethnically, it's the same people. What is "Assyrian" to you? Members of the Church of the East? Shmayo ( talk) 20:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Am I the only one? The name was chosen after a vote. That wasn't my question, do you only consider the members of the church of the east as Assyrians? Anyway, the people have one ethnic article, therefore this is a fork. Shmayo ( talk) 14:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
That is was you think of "Syriac". That discussion is at Talk:Assyrian people, not here. Shmayo ( talk) 13:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
No need to protect. The page is a fork. The new user King of Babylonia is new in Wikipedia and I understand that he don't know what's been discussed but Taivo have already explained that to him. Redirect. Shmayo ( talk) 08:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Maronites have their own article and are not a part of the ethnic article ( Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people). It's excatly the same content, no need to find excuses to keep it. All Syriac Orthodox, Chaldean Catholic and Nestorian villages are listed. It's clearly a fork. Shmayo ( talk) 11:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This people ethnic article is Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people. Just because it's named Assyrian people after the comon name doesn't meen forks can be created. When it actully is the same people, how can it not be a fork? The "List of Assyrian settlements"-article isn't just for Nestorian villages, it's for the Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people's villages (do read the content in the article!). And, Iraq, you're talking about a different thing. Talk:Assyrian people is open for you if you disagree, but do not make edits before things are discussed here and at Talk:Assyrian people. Shmayo ( talk) 07:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I would prefer it if Chaldeans were not included in the Assyrian people article unless the name is changed to A/C/S people or Syriac people. ܥܝܪܐܩ ( talk) 08:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
No, they are not. If you read discussions here you'll see that most agree on that it's the same people. And the people have one ethnic page, ethnic fork page have been removed. Read earlier discussion and you'll see it's the common name. They compared with other names and the Assyrian was much more used. So of course it's not that page forking anything. This is a new page forking the old already existing one. The people is one, if that's what's been agreed then do not edit against that on other pages, talk in the ethnic page if you have anything against it. Shmayo ( talk) 08:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
ܥܝܪܐܩ, write your comments under please. Talk:Assyrian people is the right place for that, not here. Shmayo ( talk) 08:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Saying it's the same people is very accepted. No, I said that the Assyrian people-article do contain information about the whole people. But if that's what been discussed in the talk page, it doesn't have to be discussed everywhere. If conscious about it was reached, it should be followed. Shmayo ( talk) 09:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Assyrian people is were discussions have been made. It has been as the namning conflict's talk page. Shmayo ( talk) 12:07, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Chaldeans and Assyrians are the same, that's not POV. And if they are the same, this is a fork. Shmayo ( talk) 19:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Haha, how can you even compare German and French with this. Almost everyone agree with that it is the same people. Just because one part of the Nestorian church created an own church (which grew strong first in the 19th century) doesn't mean they now are separate people. Ethnically, it's the same people. What is "Assyrian" to you? Members of the Church of the East? Shmayo ( talk) 20:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Am I the only one? The name was chosen after a vote. That wasn't my question, do you only consider the members of the church of the east as Assyrians? Anyway, the people have one ethnic article, therefore this is a fork. Shmayo ( talk) 14:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
That is was you think of "Syriac". That discussion is at Talk:Assyrian people, not here. Shmayo ( talk) 13:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)