This article was nominated for deletion on March 10, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep and move. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Physicist and astronaut Dr. McNair should be added. ProfRox ( talk) 11:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I agree he should be added as he was a physicist. I am not sure what "in the sense of this list" means, Neil DeGrasse Tyson is on this list (most known as a science communicator). Ll25533 ( talk) 23:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:African-American gospel which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
The row for Dr. Shirley Jackson currently includes the text:
However, in a recent article from MIT, there is no evidence that she helped to develop these technologies. [1]
There is also an HTML comment reading:
Questionable evidence supporting these claims
I am moving these to this talk page, as discussions belong on the talk page, not in the article itself. The article cited as a disproving reference actually makes no mention of these technologies and therefore is not an appropriate reference to the assertion of questionable evidence.
I am leaving the Citation Needed template in place.
Thisisnotatest ( talk) 00:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
@User: Thisisnotatest from User: Rb116 -- I am very new to editing on Wikipedia, and barely know what the rules are. I do not mind moving it to the Talk page if that's what Wikipedia requires, but I'm concerned that false information is on the public-facing article, and counter-evidence is hidden in the esoteric Talk page that no average person will ever look at. "Citation Needed" hints at it being potentially erroneous information, but the citations in the table's cell to the right make it seem like it's substantiated. I just looked at those references, and neither of them even mention her name, overtly or tangentially, so I deleted those references from that cell. I'm going to reword what I said, putting the emphasis on what the MIT article does say, and not even addressing the other claims made by the "Citation Needed" text.
Why are unsubstantiated claims allowed on Wikipedia? Why is a "Citation Needed" claim with no evidence allowed?
References
Is there a reason the description on his inventions/accomplishments so much longer than others or could it be summarized better? It also needs citations, but I see that other rows do not have the same needs, so perhaps this needs to be addressed Ll25533 ( talk) 23:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Does anyone know why the iOS app shows a picture of a fly, and has the short description as “Consumption of feces”? I don’t see anything like this on the web version. INDT ( talk) 06:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
An IP removed four entries which may be appropriate to re-add. See the changes here. BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 10:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC) (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.)
This article was nominated for deletion on March 10, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep and move. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Physicist and astronaut Dr. McNair should be added. ProfRox ( talk) 11:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I agree he should be added as he was a physicist. I am not sure what "in the sense of this list" means, Neil DeGrasse Tyson is on this list (most known as a science communicator). Ll25533 ( talk) 23:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:African-American gospel which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
The row for Dr. Shirley Jackson currently includes the text:
However, in a recent article from MIT, there is no evidence that she helped to develop these technologies. [1]
There is also an HTML comment reading:
Questionable evidence supporting these claims
I am moving these to this talk page, as discussions belong on the talk page, not in the article itself. The article cited as a disproving reference actually makes no mention of these technologies and therefore is not an appropriate reference to the assertion of questionable evidence.
I am leaving the Citation Needed template in place.
Thisisnotatest ( talk) 00:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
@User: Thisisnotatest from User: Rb116 -- I am very new to editing on Wikipedia, and barely know what the rules are. I do not mind moving it to the Talk page if that's what Wikipedia requires, but I'm concerned that false information is on the public-facing article, and counter-evidence is hidden in the esoteric Talk page that no average person will ever look at. "Citation Needed" hints at it being potentially erroneous information, but the citations in the table's cell to the right make it seem like it's substantiated. I just looked at those references, and neither of them even mention her name, overtly or tangentially, so I deleted those references from that cell. I'm going to reword what I said, putting the emphasis on what the MIT article does say, and not even addressing the other claims made by the "Citation Needed" text.
Why are unsubstantiated claims allowed on Wikipedia? Why is a "Citation Needed" claim with no evidence allowed?
References
Is there a reason the description on his inventions/accomplishments so much longer than others or could it be summarized better? It also needs citations, but I see that other rows do not have the same needs, so perhaps this needs to be addressed Ll25533 ( talk) 23:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Does anyone know why the iOS app shows a picture of a fly, and has the short description as “Consumption of feces”? I don’t see anything like this on the web version. INDT ( talk) 06:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
An IP removed four entries which may be appropriate to re-add. See the changes here. BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 10:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC) (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.)