This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lipoic acid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find medical sources:  Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days

Lipoic acid received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemicals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Molecular Biology: MCB Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance). Dietary Supplements Low‑importance Lipoic acid is part of WikiProject Dietary Supplements, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to dietary supplements. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Dietary SupplementsWikipedia:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsTemplate:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsDietary supplement articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

My edit, in which I added a mention of alpha-lipoic acid causing insulin autoimmune syndrome, was rolled back due to the use of a "doubtful" journal. Would then this reference pass the mark? This is a 2010 review published in Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society. -- CopperKettle ( talk) 22:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Association of ALA with the syndrome is also discussed in this 2016 review in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine - is it a good source? -- CopperKettle ( talk) 22:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

"Association" in a limited number of cases is weak evidence. I looked, and found no WP:MEDRS sources for a cause-and-effect relationship between LA and IAS. Zefr ( talk) 22:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Why shouldn't it be mentioned? The syndrome is rare, it may take decades before anybody runs any kind of study to support cause-and-effect. It is mentioned in endocrinology textbooks and in reviews, that's a fine enough reason to mention it in an encyclopedia to me. -- CopperKettle ( talk) 22:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The association is also mentioned in the Oxford Textbook of Endocrinology and Diabetes 3e (2022). -- CopperKettle ( talk) 22:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Also mentioned in Williams Textbook of Endocrinology (2019) -- CopperKettle ( talk) 22:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Mention of a possible association and unproven theory is unencyclopedic. For medical content, we use WP:MEDASSESS - those sources would be in the orange section of the levels of evidence. Zefr ( talk) 23:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

If you read into it, you will clearly see that it's not "association", and it does bring on the condition. I used the term "association" just once, by myself, to couch it in a less definite light. There's no need concentrate so hard on the word I've used once. -- CopperKettle ( talk) 04:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC) reply

It's mentioned in textbooks, which are good secondary sources, thus I see no reason to avoid mentioning it. -- CopperKettle ( talk) 04:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Let me quote from the MEDASSESS page you've provided the link to: "A tertiary source summarizes a range of secondary sources. Undergraduate or graduate level textbooks, edited scientific books, lay scientific books, and encyclopedias are tertiary sources." -- CopperKettle ( talk) 04:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Another quote: "Medical textbooks published by academic publishers are often excellent secondary sources." -- CopperKettle ( talk) 04:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC) reply