This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lions Gate Bridge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Do we need this section? It doesn't seem to add any worthwhile information (just uncited trivia). Why not just call it a landmark in the opening sentence and cut this section? Moisejp ( talk) 11:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
An IP editor, 172.218.145.134 ( talk · contribs) provided the following feedback:
Due to an issue with the feedback, it must be hidden, to avoid loosing the potentially useful feedback when it is hidden I am copying the above non problematic portion of the feedback here. I can't vouch for the accuracy, but it certainly deserves consideration. Monty 845 21:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lions Gate Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
@ Joeyconnick: For this article, retaining the existing style would mean MDY in the prose and DMY in the citations going by the pre-expansion revisions, for example this 2018 version. In the interest of reader sanity, having a single date format across all Vancouver bridge articles would be more helpful than edit warring on individual articles. Since Canada has no clear consensus on date formats, I simply wished to reflect what the sources used, which is more consistently MDY even today. Sounder Bruce 02:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lions Gate Bridge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Do we need this section? It doesn't seem to add any worthwhile information (just uncited trivia). Why not just call it a landmark in the opening sentence and cut this section? Moisejp ( talk) 11:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
An IP editor, 172.218.145.134 ( talk · contribs) provided the following feedback:
Due to an issue with the feedback, it must be hidden, to avoid loosing the potentially useful feedback when it is hidden I am copying the above non problematic portion of the feedback here. I can't vouch for the accuracy, but it certainly deserves consideration. Monty 845 21:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lions Gate Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
@ Joeyconnick: For this article, retaining the existing style would mean MDY in the prose and DMY in the citations going by the pre-expansion revisions, for example this 2018 version. In the interest of reader sanity, having a single date format across all Vancouver bridge articles would be more helpful than edit warring on individual articles. Since Canada has no clear consensus on date formats, I simply wished to reflect what the sources used, which is more consistently MDY even today. Sounder Bruce 02:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)