![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This genus comprises of more species, with a much wider temporal distribution. I will make these changes, being aware this article actually needs a full review. I will not give priority to the necessary research though. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 11:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
The illustrations used in the taxobox [Botsfordia caelata 1.png] and [Botsfordia caelata 2.png] clearly feature very different species. They cannot both be Lingulella. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 11:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
There are a few hunderd species in this genus. I'm unsure how to deal with it. I've added the list following the Global Names Index in no-wiki to the existing list in the taxobox. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 13:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This genus comprises of more species, with a much wider temporal distribution. I will make these changes, being aware this article actually needs a full review. I will not give priority to the necessary research though. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 11:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
The illustrations used in the taxobox [Botsfordia caelata 1.png] and [Botsfordia caelata 2.png] clearly feature very different species. They cannot both be Lingulella. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 11:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
There are a few hunderd species in this genus. I'm unsure how to deal with it. I've added the list following the Global Names Index in no-wiki to the existing list in the taxobox. Dwergenpaartje ( talk) 13:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)