This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lima Liturgy has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 23, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
@ JohnThorne: thank you for the lofty assessment! Just wondering, would this make a suitable GA nominee? I usually have one article in the queue at all times, but currently have none. I think I've already covered the best sources, just have to expand the lead a little bit. I also plan to translate this into Finnish, but that would be better after a successful GA run, I think. Cheers! – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 14:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Whiteguru ( talk · contribs) 08:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Due this being a long article, the GA review shall be broken into the same sections of the Article, in order to make matters manageable.
Here endeth the review in part, the part being Lead; the next section of the review shall be History.
This is a work in progress, not complete.
Here endeth the review in part, the part being History; the next section of the review shall be Structure.
This is a work in progress, not complete.
Here endeth the review in part, the part being Structure; the next section of the review shall be End Matter.
This is a work in progress, not complete. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 05:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Pass
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lima Liturgy has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 23, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
@ JohnThorne: thank you for the lofty assessment! Just wondering, would this make a suitable GA nominee? I usually have one article in the queue at all times, but currently have none. I think I've already covered the best sources, just have to expand the lead a little bit. I also plan to translate this into Finnish, but that would be better after a successful GA run, I think. Cheers! – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 14:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Whiteguru ( talk · contribs) 08:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Due this being a long article, the GA review shall be broken into the same sections of the Article, in order to make matters manageable.
Here endeth the review in part, the part being Lead; the next section of the review shall be History.
This is a work in progress, not complete.
Here endeth the review in part, the part being History; the next section of the review shall be Structure.
This is a work in progress, not complete.
Here endeth the review in part, the part being Structure; the next section of the review shall be End Matter.
This is a work in progress, not complete. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 05:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Pass