![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The map needs a minor edit, it shows El Salvador as a member of the Lima Group despite the country backing Venezuela! Tiberius Jarsve ( talk) 23:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Ecuador is a member of the Lima Group. source: https://www.14ymedio.com/internacional/Ecuador-Lima-rechaza-intervencion-Venezuela_0_2511948785.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crisd000 ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Has anyone read an official explanation to why the United States hasn’t joined the group? I think it should be added to the article. Aaker ( talk) 22:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
It seems apparent that the main reason the US has not officially joined the group is because it is the driving force behind the formation of the group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.13.204.170 ( talk) 19:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Are the funding and budget details of the Lima group made public?
2604:2000:14C5:8206:219:E3FF:FED3:9BF8 ( talk) 22:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
@ 97.80.233.19: You insist in adding that Mexico has retired from the Lima Group even though you have not provided specific sources for this claim and the media continues to quote Mexico's exception in the group's decision. Please provide a reference for this or stop the disruptive editing. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Maps needs an update.-- MaoGo ( talk) 22:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Angele201002: Hi. Your edits are becoming troublesome for several reasons not mentioned in the edit summaries. First, you're including to the section "criticizing their interventionist nature", where the cited source only focuses on Bolivia's statements on Peru's position. Besides being a biased statement, it is not supported by the reference in an editorial voice and constitutes original research.
Additionally, the text added about Peru is redundant, said information is already included in the paragraph above, with the difference that it already clarifies its current foreign affairs position. I also don't appreciate your last summary telling me "can you read??", which clearly goes against civility in the project. I'm not sure of how proper weight Evo Morales' statements have in the article; Bolivia's position should be references by an incumbent official of the Bolivian government, plain and simple. Even in this case, since the statement remains a claim, Bolivia further shouldn't be removed from the infobox. You said that you have provided a source to back this up, but I can't find any difference between both versions ( diff).
Last but not least, you're also removing maintenance inline tags without explanation (Bare url inline and Primary source inline). Because of all these reasons, I kindly ask you to self revert the changes and comment which are precisely the changes that you're proposing, which I assume is the claim that Bolivia left the group. Are there official statements that support this? Kind regards. -- NoonIcarus ( talk) 11:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The map needs a minor edit, it shows El Salvador as a member of the Lima Group despite the country backing Venezuela! Tiberius Jarsve ( talk) 23:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Ecuador is a member of the Lima Group. source: https://www.14ymedio.com/internacional/Ecuador-Lima-rechaza-intervencion-Venezuela_0_2511948785.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crisd000 ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Has anyone read an official explanation to why the United States hasn’t joined the group? I think it should be added to the article. Aaker ( talk) 22:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
It seems apparent that the main reason the US has not officially joined the group is because it is the driving force behind the formation of the group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.13.204.170 ( talk) 19:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Are the funding and budget details of the Lima group made public?
2604:2000:14C5:8206:219:E3FF:FED3:9BF8 ( talk) 22:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
@ 97.80.233.19: You insist in adding that Mexico has retired from the Lima Group even though you have not provided specific sources for this claim and the media continues to quote Mexico's exception in the group's decision. Please provide a reference for this or stop the disruptive editing. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Maps needs an update.-- MaoGo ( talk) 22:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Angele201002: Hi. Your edits are becoming troublesome for several reasons not mentioned in the edit summaries. First, you're including to the section "criticizing their interventionist nature", where the cited source only focuses on Bolivia's statements on Peru's position. Besides being a biased statement, it is not supported by the reference in an editorial voice and constitutes original research.
Additionally, the text added about Peru is redundant, said information is already included in the paragraph above, with the difference that it already clarifies its current foreign affairs position. I also don't appreciate your last summary telling me "can you read??", which clearly goes against civility in the project. I'm not sure of how proper weight Evo Morales' statements have in the article; Bolivia's position should be references by an incumbent official of the Bolivian government, plain and simple. Even in this case, since the statement remains a claim, Bolivia further shouldn't be removed from the infobox. You said that you have provided a source to back this up, but I can't find any difference between both versions ( diff).
Last but not least, you're also removing maintenance inline tags without explanation (Bare url inline and Primary source inline). Because of all these reasons, I kindly ask you to self revert the changes and comment which are precisely the changes that you're proposing, which I assume is the claim that Bolivia left the group. Are there official statements that support this? Kind regards. -- NoonIcarus ( talk) 11:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)