![]() | A fact from Lilstock appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 January 2008, and was viewed approximately 6,709 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"The small Church of St. Andrew, with only two rows of pews, has a chancel arch which dates from a 14th century which was demolished in 1881, when present structure erected."
from a 14th century what? Murderbike ( talk) 05:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I suspect that the item moved from the church was a Norman font, but the referenced source does say front, and I have no way to sort it out. It's not often that you move a whole wall of a church, while the (apparently unused) font would be a notable item. If someone perhaps has more knowledge of the actual situation, this could get fixed (if necessary). Davidlwilliamson ( talk) 06:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lilstock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lilstock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Lilstock appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 January 2008, and was viewed approximately 6,709 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"The small Church of St. Andrew, with only two rows of pews, has a chancel arch which dates from a 14th century which was demolished in 1881, when present structure erected."
from a 14th century what? Murderbike ( talk) 05:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I suspect that the item moved from the church was a Norman font, but the referenced source does say front, and I have no way to sort it out. It's not often that you move a whole wall of a church, while the (apparently unused) font would be a notable item. If someone perhaps has more knowledge of the actual situation, this could get fixed (if necessary). Davidlwilliamson ( talk) 06:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lilstock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lilstock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)