| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 10:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a. (
reference section):
- b. (citations to
reliable sources):
- c. (
OR):
- d. (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a. (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (
major aspects):
- b. (
focused):
- a. (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- b. (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
I'll be reviewing this article. Tintor2 ( talk) 10:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Everything looking good.
- Only few isses I see are addressing what Production I.G and Gainax are when first mentioned Got a similar response when dealing with that Jujutsu Kaisen 0 movie.
- Is it possible to balance the lead a bit? The first paragraph is kinda big in comparison to the following ones.
- "of ozone in the area" might explain a bit this in case somebody is confused.
- "Evangelion Chronicle magazine, on the other hand, noted how Okamura, in charge of producing the storyboards, blends science fiction and human drama into his works.[21]" seems fitting for the reception
- There is something important that might be missing in Plot. What's Ritsuko's focus that's mentioned in reception?
@ TeenAngels1234: That's all. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- @ Tintor2: I should have everything sorted out. The only point is the one about Evangelion Chronicle: since it is an official encyclopaedia licensed by Gainax - which I believe also gave the first-hand canon materials to write it - I don't find it pertinent to move the info to Repection.-- TeenAngels1234 ( talk) 16:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Passing the review. Good work. Tintor2 ( talk) 17:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 10:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a. (
reference section):
- b. (citations to
reliable sources):
- c. (
OR):
- d. (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a. (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (
major aspects):
- b. (
focused):
- a. (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- b. (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
I'll be reviewing this article. Tintor2 ( talk) 10:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Everything looking good.
- Only few isses I see are addressing what Production I.G and Gainax are when first mentioned Got a similar response when dealing with that Jujutsu Kaisen 0 movie.
- Is it possible to balance the lead a bit? The first paragraph is kinda big in comparison to the following ones.
- "of ozone in the area" might explain a bit this in case somebody is confused.
- "Evangelion Chronicle magazine, on the other hand, noted how Okamura, in charge of producing the storyboards, blends science fiction and human drama into his works.[21]" seems fitting for the reception
- There is something important that might be missing in Plot. What's Ritsuko's focus that's mentioned in reception?
@ TeenAngels1234: That's all. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- @ Tintor2: I should have everything sorted out. The only point is the one about Evangelion Chronicle: since it is an official encyclopaedia licensed by Gainax - which I believe also gave the first-hand canon materials to write it - I don't find it pertinent to move the info to Repection.-- TeenAngels1234 ( talk) 16:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Passing the review. Good work. Tintor2 ( talk) 17:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)