Article (
|
visual edit |
history)Ā Ā·
Article talk (
|
history)Ā Ā·
Watch
Reviewer: S Masters ( talk) 15:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments: I am concerned about the reliability of the sources. Besides Aspenberg , the rest of the sources comes from one website (which by the way, has a hidden trojan virus!). I am unable to ascertain if this site is reliable. Can you please provide me with more information on the site (as it is in Norwegian), and how it would comply with WP:RS? Thanks.
Final comments: Thank you for your explanation. I have checked with WP:RS and found that there are exceptions which can be accepted, and I believe this one of them. As such, I am confident that this article meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as one. -- S Masters ( talk) 06:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history)Ā Ā·
Article talk (
|
history)Ā Ā·
Watch
Reviewer: S Masters ( talk) 15:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments: I am concerned about the reliability of the sources. Besides Aspenberg , the rest of the sources comes from one website (which by the way, has a hidden trojan virus!). I am unable to ascertain if this site is reliable. Can you please provide me with more information on the site (as it is in Norwegian), and how it would comply with WP:RS? Thanks.
Final comments: Thank you for your explanation. I have checked with WP:RS and found that there are exceptions which can be accepted, and I believe this one of them. As such, I am confident that this article meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as one. -- S Masters ( talk) 06:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)