From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: LunaEclipse ( talk · contribs) 12:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Pollosito ( talk · contribs) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a ( reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Hi, @ LunaEclipse. I think I'll be reviewing the article at the end of the month, although I want that to happen sooner. My apologies for that. Best, Santi ( talk) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Pollosito, take your time, I won't mind at all. —  🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 14:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Lead

  • I suggest you move the present source to the body of the article. Refs in this section only apply if it's too short or one paragraph long. Santi ( talk) 14:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Background

  • It seems absurdly short to me. Could you put information about the album it belongs to? In articles about songs they usually do that. Santi ( talk) 13:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • The ref 2 doesn't mention that "First Person Shooter" is part of For All the Dogs. Although I know it is out of a sense of logic, at least I would prefer to verify those specific details. Santi ( talk) 14:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Record producer Metro Boomin announced a collaborative album with rapper Future in an interview by Flaunt Magazine, set to release in 2023. He had saved a few tracks he produced for the latter for the album. First, I see in the reference that it says only "collaboration", not "collaborative album". Second, I don't see any mention of saved tracks, or I got lost from reading so much (I almost fell asleep, in fact, I'm not in my season of wanting to read LOL). Santi ( talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • @ Pollosito: I have addressed your comments, you may continue with the review. lunaeclipse ( talk) 20:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ LunaEclipse: Thank you for remembering. I will address the article at the same time as the other one I am reviewing, but not today, because I am on my cell phone, and it is hard for me to manage Wikipedia with that and that is why I hate it. Santi ( talk) 22:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Is there a better reference to confirm the trailer other than the trailer itself? Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • It would be a good idea to put information about the tracklist and what position it was there. Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Archiving mising: ref 1, 4, 5, 6 and 8. Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Pipe Revolt to Revolt (TV network). Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: LunaEclipse ( talk · contribs) 12:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Pollosito ( talk · contribs) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a ( reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Hi, @ LunaEclipse. I think I'll be reviewing the article at the end of the month, although I want that to happen sooner. My apologies for that. Best, Santi ( talk) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Pollosito, take your time, I won't mind at all. —  🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 14:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Lead

  • I suggest you move the present source to the body of the article. Refs in this section only apply if it's too short or one paragraph long. Santi ( talk) 14:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Background

  • It seems absurdly short to me. Could you put information about the album it belongs to? In articles about songs they usually do that. Santi ( talk) 13:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • The ref 2 doesn't mention that "First Person Shooter" is part of For All the Dogs. Although I know it is out of a sense of logic, at least I would prefer to verify those specific details. Santi ( talk) 14:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Record producer Metro Boomin announced a collaborative album with rapper Future in an interview by Flaunt Magazine, set to release in 2023. He had saved a few tracks he produced for the latter for the album. First, I see in the reference that it says only "collaboration", not "collaborative album". Second, I don't see any mention of saved tracks, or I got lost from reading so much (I almost fell asleep, in fact, I'm not in my season of wanting to read LOL). Santi ( talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done 🌙Eclipse ( talk) ( contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  • @ Pollosito: I have addressed your comments, you may continue with the review. lunaeclipse ( talk) 20:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ LunaEclipse: Thank you for remembering. I will address the article at the same time as the other one I am reviewing, but not today, because I am on my cell phone, and it is hard for me to manage Wikipedia with that and that is why I hate it. Santi ( talk) 22:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Is there a better reference to confirm the trailer other than the trailer itself? Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • It would be a good idea to put information about the tracklist and what position it was there. Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Archiving mising: ref 1, 4, 5, 6 and 8. Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Pipe Revolt to Revolt (TV network). Santi ( talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook