![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quitree embarassing, really. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.124.83 ( talk) 21:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Lieutenant Commander (United States) → Lieutenant commander (United States) — To conform with the grammar guidelines set forth by Wiki:MOSCAPS — Neovu79 ( talk) 03:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
The guidelines say to capitalize both. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.231.117.36 (
talk)
20:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
All of the following should redirect to this article. As it stands, it is a pain-in-the can to people. Computers should take care of such things:
Lieutenant commander (United States)
Lieutenant Commander (United States)
Lieutenant Commander (U.S.)
Lieutenant Commander (U.S. Navy)
Lt. Commander (U.S.)
Lt. Commander (United States)
Lt. Commander (U.S. Navy)
Once again, make the computers do the work, rather than fretting us with red hyperlinks.
98.67.168.193 (
talk)
22:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.22:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
As this article was created it stated in accordance with the source linked under point [1] that the Lieutenant Commander would count as the most junior officer of the "midgrade" officers, like his land based counterpart the Major.
That has been reverted to tell today that the lieutenant Commander would be the most senior of the junior officers. But neither is that stated in the source that still is linked nor is any other source given for that implication.
Please source or revert to the original state that has been sourced on a official Navy site. -- 212.144.126.46 ( talk) 22:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quitree embarassing, really. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.124.83 ( talk) 21:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Lieutenant Commander (United States) → Lieutenant commander (United States) — To conform with the grammar guidelines set forth by Wiki:MOSCAPS — Neovu79 ( talk) 03:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
The guidelines say to capitalize both. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.231.117.36 (
talk)
20:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
All of the following should redirect to this article. As it stands, it is a pain-in-the can to people. Computers should take care of such things:
Lieutenant commander (United States)
Lieutenant Commander (United States)
Lieutenant Commander (U.S.)
Lieutenant Commander (U.S. Navy)
Lt. Commander (U.S.)
Lt. Commander (United States)
Lt. Commander (U.S. Navy)
Once again, make the computers do the work, rather than fretting us with red hyperlinks.
98.67.168.193 (
talk)
22:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.22:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
As this article was created it stated in accordance with the source linked under point [1] that the Lieutenant Commander would count as the most junior officer of the "midgrade" officers, like his land based counterpart the Major.
That has been reverted to tell today that the lieutenant Commander would be the most senior of the junior officers. But neither is that stated in the source that still is linked nor is any other source given for that implication.
Please source or revert to the original state that has been sourced on a official Navy site. -- 212.144.126.46 ( talk) 22:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)