Lichtenstein Castle (Württemberg) was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's " European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The major barrier to this becoming B-Class or higher is the referencing. Every paragraph (or each bullet point in Pop Culture and so on) should end with a citation to a reliable source. I've assessed the coverage aspect as meeting B-Class criteria, although it would be good to know why the tower and the rest of the castle structure seem to be of dissimilar style -- that wasn't apparent to me from reading the article. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 23:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 10W40 ( talk · contribs) 14:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Firstly, I'd like to thank you for reviewing my article I've submitted this article twice before for evaluation at WikiProject Military history's assessment requests page and both times, despite improvements to length, was told that the article is somewhat lacking with references, which I agree with but was mostly unable to assuage. Thanks again!
Initial comment response
At the top of the page, there is the use of both
Template:Distinugish and
Template:Other uses. There is a filled etymology slot with citation in the infobox that I did not add (if memory serves another editor added it as a correction of one of my edits). The idea of adding the differences between "Licht" and "Liech" are trivia at best IMO.
The picture used in the article is indeed Lichtenstein Castle and not Nueschwanstein; no content from that page was used on this page.
Review comments
This was my first Good Article, and I am here now to say it does not deserve the honor. This article is a piece of crap, and I do not presently have the desire or resources to fix it. To tell the truth, I've wanted to smite this article for a long time now, but never summoned up the willpower. It does not have many sources, many are not quality, and the prose is lacking in depth and quality. The reviewer, a sockpuppet of a banned editor, did not seem to care. And it has a "popular culture" section. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Lichtenstein Castle (Württemberg) was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's " European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The major barrier to this becoming B-Class or higher is the referencing. Every paragraph (or each bullet point in Pop Culture and so on) should end with a citation to a reliable source. I've assessed the coverage aspect as meeting B-Class criteria, although it would be good to know why the tower and the rest of the castle structure seem to be of dissimilar style -- that wasn't apparent to me from reading the article. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 23:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 10W40 ( talk · contribs) 14:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Firstly, I'd like to thank you for reviewing my article I've submitted this article twice before for evaluation at WikiProject Military history's assessment requests page and both times, despite improvements to length, was told that the article is somewhat lacking with references, which I agree with but was mostly unable to assuage. Thanks again!
Initial comment response
At the top of the page, there is the use of both
Template:Distinugish and
Template:Other uses. There is a filled etymology slot with citation in the infobox that I did not add (if memory serves another editor added it as a correction of one of my edits). The idea of adding the differences between "Licht" and "Liech" are trivia at best IMO.
The picture used in the article is indeed Lichtenstein Castle and not Nueschwanstein; no content from that page was used on this page.
Review comments
This was my first Good Article, and I am here now to say it does not deserve the honor. This article is a piece of crap, and I do not presently have the desire or resources to fix it. To tell the truth, I've wanted to smite this article for a long time now, but never summoned up the willpower. It does not have many sources, many are not quality, and the prose is lacking in depth and quality. The reviewer, a sockpuppet of a banned editor, did not seem to care. And it has a "popular culture" section. – ♠Vami _IV†♠ 12:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)