This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Liberals for Forests article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I can't find the discussion regarding the page move, so I'll just kick in here.
The material from Liberals for forests should be merged into this article, Liberals for Forests. — Michael Z. 2005-04-17 16:54 Z
Matturn, since you own the entire edit history for "liberals for forests", we can probably get around merging the histories. Just incorporate or replace the text of that article into this one, or replacing this one, and everybody has credit.
Then we'll still have to vote on moving from this name to that name, since the move will require an admin (because the page liberals for forests has a history).
This will simplify the task for an admin, and will leave us in a situation with one article, instead of two. — Michael Z. 2005-04-17 19:03 Z
Article names can't begin with a lowercase letter (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions). I suggest merging the articles at Liberals for forests, adding {{wrongtitle|liberals for forests}} at the beginning of the article, and making Liberals for Forests redirect to Liberals for forests. — tregoweth 01:44, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
I just came along to do the merge but found a few issues:
violet/riga (t) 21:59, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved.
I've contacted a few editors involved here and I guess it's going to remain a stalemate...
Also, to propose a merger you should probably use Wikipedia:Proposed mergers.
WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Liberals for Forests → liberals for forests – This was improperly moved as uncontroversial to the uncapitalised version several years ago, but unfortunately none of us noticed. The party's name, rather infamously, was not capitalised. Frickeg ( talk) 10:33, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Liberals for Forests article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I can't find the discussion regarding the page move, so I'll just kick in here.
The material from Liberals for forests should be merged into this article, Liberals for Forests. — Michael Z. 2005-04-17 16:54 Z
Matturn, since you own the entire edit history for "liberals for forests", we can probably get around merging the histories. Just incorporate or replace the text of that article into this one, or replacing this one, and everybody has credit.
Then we'll still have to vote on moving from this name to that name, since the move will require an admin (because the page liberals for forests has a history).
This will simplify the task for an admin, and will leave us in a situation with one article, instead of two. — Michael Z. 2005-04-17 19:03 Z
Article names can't begin with a lowercase letter (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions). I suggest merging the articles at Liberals for forests, adding {{wrongtitle|liberals for forests}} at the beginning of the article, and making Liberals for Forests redirect to Liberals for forests. — tregoweth 01:44, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
I just came along to do the merge but found a few issues:
violet/riga (t) 21:59, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved.
I've contacted a few editors involved here and I guess it's going to remain a stalemate...
Also, to propose a merger you should probably use Wikipedia:Proposed mergers.
WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Liberals for Forests → liberals for forests – This was improperly moved as uncontroversial to the uncapitalised version several years ago, but unfortunately none of us noticed. The party's name, rather infamously, was not capitalised. Frickeg ( talk) 10:33, 25 March 2017 (UTC)