![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could somebody who understands what this is about rewrite the example please? First it talks about X, Y, and Z, but then suddenly there are references to B. Also It says there are more items in bundle 2, but unless my basic arithmetic is wrong that is not the case. 72.227.136.130 02:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
In a book, I saw the author state that lexicographic preferences relation are strictly convex. However, I think that lexicographic preference relation is not necessarily to be convex, not to mention strictly convex. Although I admit that lexicographic order is strictly convex. 132.206.46.130 ( talk) 00:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
This is just a nonstandard utility function, with infinitesimal utilities. It shouldn't be made to look like a nontrivial paradox, it's the usual bullshit you can do with the real numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.111.98.212 ( talk) 21:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could somebody who understands what this is about rewrite the example please? First it talks about X, Y, and Z, but then suddenly there are references to B. Also It says there are more items in bundle 2, but unless my basic arithmetic is wrong that is not the case. 72.227.136.130 02:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
In a book, I saw the author state that lexicographic preferences relation are strictly convex. However, I think that lexicographic preference relation is not necessarily to be convex, not to mention strictly convex. Although I admit that lexicographic order is strictly convex. 132.206.46.130 ( talk) 00:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
This is just a nonstandard utility function, with infinitesimal utilities. It shouldn't be made to look like a nontrivial paradox, it's the usual bullshit you can do with the real numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.111.98.212 ( talk) 21:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)