![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
"tragedies of Aeschylus (of which, only Electra and Ajax were done)": something is amiss here. Electra and Ajax are by Sophocles, not Aeschylus. Unfortunately I don't have time to research the correct info right now.
Hi, I was doing a bit of housekeeping on the Shakespeare related categories and made a mistake when adding the Class rating for this article. I'd meant to just propogate the rating from WP:BIO, but set it to Stub by mistake.
However, since the rating was reverted I had occasion to go look at the article in more detail and while it's a nice article would easily have merited Start class rating otherwise, it doesn't fill the criteria (e.g. see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Quality_scale) because it doesn't cite a single reliable source that I can find. -- Xover ( talk) 15:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I added the "inappropriate tone" banner to the article. "...landmark figure both in the history of Shakespearean editing and in literary satire," just to name one instance, does not seem entirely correct or appropriate. In any case, the article has a lot of weasel words and is not written in clear or concise style. Jermor ( talk) 15:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
"tragedies of Aeschylus (of which, only Electra and Ajax were done)": something is amiss here. Electra and Ajax are by Sophocles, not Aeschylus. Unfortunately I don't have time to research the correct info right now.
Hi, I was doing a bit of housekeeping on the Shakespeare related categories and made a mistake when adding the Class rating for this article. I'd meant to just propogate the rating from WP:BIO, but set it to Stub by mistake.
However, since the rating was reverted I had occasion to go look at the article in more detail and while it's a nice article would easily have merited Start class rating otherwise, it doesn't fill the criteria (e.g. see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Quality_scale) because it doesn't cite a single reliable source that I can find. -- Xover ( talk) 15:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I added the "inappropriate tone" banner to the article. "...landmark figure both in the history of Shakespearean editing and in literary satire," just to name one instance, does not seem entirely correct or appropriate. In any case, the article has a lot of weasel words and is not written in clear or concise style. Jermor ( talk) 15:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)