This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 7 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Levelling-up policy of the Boris Johnson government to Levelling-up policy of the British government. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Firstly, thanks for creating the article. I added a criticism section to try and give it more balanced coverage, and added 2 problem tags:
I'm also concerned about whether this is sufficiently notability for a stand-alone article, but there's a fair amount of media coverage so perhaps it's fine? Jr8825 • Talk 23:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
I've had an attempt at editing this - mostly cutting down on the size of the quotations. Let me know if this works and I will remove the concern box BillyDee ( talk) 13:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Wp makes ref to middle ages Florence as example. How is that valid? East / west German reunification started 1990, still going, cost £1.7 trillion. Where is UK govs guesstimate of cost? How long will it take at £5 billion a year? I mean just hs2 at £100 billion would take 20 years. German reunification 340 years. As well no real future plan in wp. If wfh (& poss 4 day week) reduces commute, pollution, transport expansion.. Where is that in wp? If wfh is a thing.. That affects cities, transport, housing, shops (wfh and online shopping). There's no prioritisation of mobile / broadband. No mention starlink / one Web for instance for not spots. Also no comparison with other countries.. Japan, South Korea etc specific to fibre or mobile. Also no mention previous attempts (fails?) at levelling up.. Helseline mentions attempts in 1990s.. And part failure due to local politicians (losing power, jobs etc). Bbc had podcast discussing levelling up. What levelling up was tried under Labour govs? 92.40.196.34 ( talk) 14:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
> The above is something of a political rant. However, to bring the topic back to the merger. I support merging the White Paper article into this main article. While the White Paper has received a lot of media attention due to its delay and Levelling Up being a flagship policy, I don't think the document will be a big deal in an of itself. If the Beeching Reports (which arguably have had a bigger impact on UK than this policy document will) are part of a wider article on the Beeching Cuts, I think this is an appropriate precedent to follow BillyDee ( talk) 10:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus seems to be that the title should reflect the policy continuing to persist after Boris Johnson's own tenure and thus should be moved elsewhere ASAP. Another RM can be held over which qualifiers are better. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 15:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Levelling-up policy of the Boris Johnson government → Levelling-up policy of the British government – The levelling-up policy is being continued by the new prime minister Liz Truss and another levelling-up secretary has been appointed in her government. ThatRandomGuy1 ( talk) 11:51, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus. ( non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Levelling-up policy of the British government → Levelling up in the United Kingdom – I suggest another move of this article, this time to "Levelling up in the United Kingdom". The "Origins" section of the article and the recent (relative to the previous move) announcement that Labour would also pursue a levelling up policy programme suggests that support for the concept extends beyond the current Levelling Up policy made by the Conservatives under their manifesto and by the Levelling Up white paper. This would future-proof the article, allowing it to extend beyond the policy of Johnson's, Truss' and Sunak's administrations. It would also have the benefit of aligning the spelling of levelling up with most primary and secondary sources (without the hyphen). [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Jèrriais janne ( talk) 19:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Colonestarrice ( talk) 16:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 7 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Levelling-up policy of the Boris Johnson government to Levelling-up policy of the British government. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Firstly, thanks for creating the article. I added a criticism section to try and give it more balanced coverage, and added 2 problem tags:
I'm also concerned about whether this is sufficiently notability for a stand-alone article, but there's a fair amount of media coverage so perhaps it's fine? Jr8825 • Talk 23:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
I've had an attempt at editing this - mostly cutting down on the size of the quotations. Let me know if this works and I will remove the concern box BillyDee ( talk) 13:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Wp makes ref to middle ages Florence as example. How is that valid? East / west German reunification started 1990, still going, cost £1.7 trillion. Where is UK govs guesstimate of cost? How long will it take at £5 billion a year? I mean just hs2 at £100 billion would take 20 years. German reunification 340 years. As well no real future plan in wp. If wfh (& poss 4 day week) reduces commute, pollution, transport expansion.. Where is that in wp? If wfh is a thing.. That affects cities, transport, housing, shops (wfh and online shopping). There's no prioritisation of mobile / broadband. No mention starlink / one Web for instance for not spots. Also no comparison with other countries.. Japan, South Korea etc specific to fibre or mobile. Also no mention previous attempts (fails?) at levelling up.. Helseline mentions attempts in 1990s.. And part failure due to local politicians (losing power, jobs etc). Bbc had podcast discussing levelling up. What levelling up was tried under Labour govs? 92.40.196.34 ( talk) 14:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
> The above is something of a political rant. However, to bring the topic back to the merger. I support merging the White Paper article into this main article. While the White Paper has received a lot of media attention due to its delay and Levelling Up being a flagship policy, I don't think the document will be a big deal in an of itself. If the Beeching Reports (which arguably have had a bigger impact on UK than this policy document will) are part of a wider article on the Beeching Cuts, I think this is an appropriate precedent to follow BillyDee ( talk) 10:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus seems to be that the title should reflect the policy continuing to persist after Boris Johnson's own tenure and thus should be moved elsewhere ASAP. Another RM can be held over which qualifiers are better. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 15:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Levelling-up policy of the Boris Johnson government → Levelling-up policy of the British government – The levelling-up policy is being continued by the new prime minister Liz Truss and another levelling-up secretary has been appointed in her government. ThatRandomGuy1 ( talk) 11:51, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus. ( non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Levelling-up policy of the British government → Levelling up in the United Kingdom – I suggest another move of this article, this time to "Levelling up in the United Kingdom". The "Origins" section of the article and the recent (relative to the previous move) announcement that Labour would also pursue a levelling up policy programme suggests that support for the concept extends beyond the current Levelling Up policy made by the Conservatives under their manifesto and by the Levelling Up white paper. This would future-proof the article, allowing it to extend beyond the policy of Johnson's, Truss' and Sunak's administrations. It would also have the benefit of aligning the spelling of levelling up with most primary and secondary sources (without the hyphen). [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Jèrriais janne ( talk) 19:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Colonestarrice ( talk) 16:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)