This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Leonardo MPLM page were merged into Leonardo (ISS module). For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
According to both NASA and builder Thales Alenia, the module is called the Permanent Multipurpose Module, not the Pressurized Multipurpose Module. If no one has any objections, I'll move the page to the accurate name in a day or so. Jesternaut ( talk) 00:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi folks, I'd like to suggest that we merge the Leonardo MPLM and Permanent Multipurpose Module into a new article, possibly called Leonardo (ISS module), and have the two existing pages redirect to it. What we have currently is an unsatisfactory situation where two articles discuss the same spacecraft, simply in different guises, and I feel that having 'MPLM' and 'PMM' sections in one overarching article would be a better solution. Any thoughts? Colds7ream ( talk) 09:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Since in the STS-102 image there is no pressurised tunnel I guess it was. Did it stay berthed after the delivering Orbiter left or did it always go back in the same orbiter ? - Rod57 ( talk) 22:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Leonardo MPLM page were merged into Leonardo (ISS module). For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
According to both NASA and builder Thales Alenia, the module is called the Permanent Multipurpose Module, not the Pressurized Multipurpose Module. If no one has any objections, I'll move the page to the accurate name in a day or so. Jesternaut ( talk) 00:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi folks, I'd like to suggest that we merge the Leonardo MPLM and Permanent Multipurpose Module into a new article, possibly called Leonardo (ISS module), and have the two existing pages redirect to it. What we have currently is an unsatisfactory situation where two articles discuss the same spacecraft, simply in different guises, and I feel that having 'MPLM' and 'PMM' sections in one overarching article would be a better solution. Any thoughts? Colds7ream ( talk) 09:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Since in the STS-102 image there is no pressurised tunnel I guess it was. Did it stay berthed after the delivering Orbiter left or did it always go back in the same orbiter ? - Rod57 ( talk) 22:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)