![]() | Leon Leuty has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 4, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ GiantSnowman: Hi, I appreciate you have a vested interest in the article as the creator, which is fine, so I don't want to get into any minor disputes. Just wondered if you could consider the text from the source regarding involvement with, I assume, Rolls Royce Leisure F.C. (in his own words), which states as little as "I made my come-back with Rolls-Royce". I don't know if this is adequate to classify as being part of his "youth career", particularly as he had meaningful trials with both Bolton and Chesterfield (neither of which I would plan to add to the infobox either). I know you're more on-top of football bios than me, but can you guide me why his apparent appearance for RR qualifies this determination? I plan to expand the article further with sources I have yet to assess, so it may be this becomes clearer further down the line anyway! Bungle ( talk • contribs) 19:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
"just nearly 2 decades of editing"- you and me both! Alas, it seems from your response that the inclusion, or not, rests entirely at one's own preference and I don't presently consider it a significant enough issue to dispute over. There is plenty of material out there to otherwise build a solid article from. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Bungle ( talk · contribs) 18:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: PearlyGigs ( talk · contribs) 22:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Bungle. I'll do this review. There is a GAN backlog drive this month. Hope to let you have some feedback soon. PearlyGigs ( talk) 22:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Just to let you know I've read the article and will select some citations for spot-check next. That might not be until tomorrow, though. PearlyGigs ( talk) 15:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
There are 35 citations in total, so I'll check nos 07, 14, 21, 28, and 34. The statements are:
especially as Bradford at the time were fighting relegation in the Second Division.
No problem with these citations so I'll move on to the main review of the article now, where I'll refer to the six WP:GACR requirements. PearlyGigs ( talk) 20:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
A very good piece of work, Bungle. I'm promoting to GA. Well done and best wishes. PearlyGigs ( talk) 20:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Leon Leuty has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 4, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ GiantSnowman: Hi, I appreciate you have a vested interest in the article as the creator, which is fine, so I don't want to get into any minor disputes. Just wondered if you could consider the text from the source regarding involvement with, I assume, Rolls Royce Leisure F.C. (in his own words), which states as little as "I made my come-back with Rolls-Royce". I don't know if this is adequate to classify as being part of his "youth career", particularly as he had meaningful trials with both Bolton and Chesterfield (neither of which I would plan to add to the infobox either). I know you're more on-top of football bios than me, but can you guide me why his apparent appearance for RR qualifies this determination? I plan to expand the article further with sources I have yet to assess, so it may be this becomes clearer further down the line anyway! Bungle ( talk • contribs) 19:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
"just nearly 2 decades of editing"- you and me both! Alas, it seems from your response that the inclusion, or not, rests entirely at one's own preference and I don't presently consider it a significant enough issue to dispute over. There is plenty of material out there to otherwise build a solid article from. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Bungle ( talk · contribs) 18:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: PearlyGigs ( talk · contribs) 22:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Bungle. I'll do this review. There is a GAN backlog drive this month. Hope to let you have some feedback soon. PearlyGigs ( talk) 22:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Just to let you know I've read the article and will select some citations for spot-check next. That might not be until tomorrow, though. PearlyGigs ( talk) 15:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
There are 35 citations in total, so I'll check nos 07, 14, 21, 28, and 34. The statements are:
especially as Bradford at the time were fighting relegation in the Second Division.
No problem with these citations so I'll move on to the main review of the article now, where I'll refer to the six WP:GACR requirements. PearlyGigs ( talk) 20:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
A very good piece of work, Bungle. I'm promoting to GA. Well done and best wishes. PearlyGigs ( talk) 20:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)