![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
does anyone know why the fact that this scientist has been accused of misconduct has been erased a few times?? Why is this not relevant?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.177.54 ( talk) 09:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Seconded. "Cases of scientific misconduct" still links here, however the editor 24.247.121.82 has consistently removed this relevant information and has written a rather glowing biography of the subject. I realise that biographies of living people are legally sensitive, esp. after that Kennedy assassination libel, but this is a well documented case resulting in a paper trail, which I believe was properly cited and attributed. 131.111.184.95 ( talk) 02:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
As the person who was plagiarized, I am confounded that only a minor slap on the hand was all that was enforced. He destroyed my opportunities for an academic career and significant contributions my proposal would have given to science. Dr. C M Adams
The charges appear undue since there is no mention of what the charges are, this is a living person biography and undue weight to something not explained MUST be removed. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 04:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Should anyone wish to attempt to revitalize these now extinct URLs, here they are:
I am focusing instead on amassing good, revelatory secondary sources on the subject, so I and others can move it toward being encyclopedic. Cheers. Le Prof 50.179.252.14 ( talk) 22:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
does anyone know why the fact that this scientist has been accused of misconduct has been erased a few times?? Why is this not relevant?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.177.54 ( talk) 09:28, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Seconded. "Cases of scientific misconduct" still links here, however the editor 24.247.121.82 has consistently removed this relevant information and has written a rather glowing biography of the subject. I realise that biographies of living people are legally sensitive, esp. after that Kennedy assassination libel, but this is a well documented case resulting in a paper trail, which I believe was properly cited and attributed. 131.111.184.95 ( talk) 02:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
As the person who was plagiarized, I am confounded that only a minor slap on the hand was all that was enforced. He destroyed my opportunities for an academic career and significant contributions my proposal would have given to science. Dr. C M Adams
The charges appear undue since there is no mention of what the charges are, this is a living person biography and undue weight to something not explained MUST be removed. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 04:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Should anyone wish to attempt to revitalize these now extinct URLs, here they are:
I am focusing instead on amassing good, revelatory secondary sources on the subject, so I and others can move it toward being encyclopedic. Cheers. Le Prof 50.179.252.14 ( talk) 22:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)