This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Will this game going out for PS2? Basically, my only doubt is whether it will come or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laundromatlock ( talk • contribs) 00:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Lego always release their games to all consoles (expect Lego Battles which was only for DS) and this one is no exception. 123.200.196.98 ( talk) 02:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I heard in the Lego Indiana Jones 2 offical sites said is going to come to PS2 but the other websites said that is not going to come out to PS2. I'am not quite sure whether is cancel or postphone for PS2? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.18.239 ( talk) 03:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
In the main official sites said is going to come to PS2 and I wonder whether this official sites tell wrongly or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.24.123 ( talk) 15:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
How about wait for the main official sites explain about whether can come to PS2 or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.24.123 ( talk) 15:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Few days ago, I found that the official sites said is going come to PS2 and now I found that PS2 had removed from the official sites for the unknown reason whether is cancelled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.21.50 ( talk) 15:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
That TT Games cancelled the PS2 version very unfair just like Lego Harry Potter for PS2 also cancelled. They all lie in the trailer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.133.54.119 ( talk) 15:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't the boxart image be replaced by one that doesn't have "RP" rating?
Alpheta (
talk)
01:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Done. Used the old image and put the E10+ rating from another cover and put it over the old one.
Davie247 (
talk)
09:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
It may have been promised but it doesn't actually work.
S!egfried ( talk) 08:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
There's no mention of the differing gameplay between the PSP/DS versions of the game against the PS3/Xbox360/PC version. Should a mention be made of these versions in the article, as the gameplay is vastly different between the PSP/DS versions and the mainstream versions? Ggctuk ( talk) 21:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I was looking at the "Doom Town" level gameplay videos online that I think come from the XBox version and they're nothing like the PSP version! (Lego Batman was pretty much the same across platforms) How much of this game is different on different systems? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.112.148 ( talk) 01:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
it should be added to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.75.209 ( talk) 09:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Well? Any developments on this front? Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 19:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
By no means is this article contradicting Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING right? And it is certainly not blatant promotion of a product of dubious virtue, right? -- Kku ( talk) 12:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SyntheticSystems ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The prose is decent but requires an understanding of the game to comprehend and many of the transitions are weak. |
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | No MoS violations. |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | References match up what is in the article. |
![]() |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | All statements are sourced. |
![]() |
(c) (original research) | No original research, although the author may have played the game. |
![]() |
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | No plagiarism. |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | As stated earlier, an understanding of the game is necessary to understand the article. |
![]() |
(b) (focused) | Certain sections, such as the development section, don't go into enough detail. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Neutral. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No edit wars. |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | Images need alt text. |
![]() |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Image placement could be better. |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
![]() |
Needs more improvements but is workable. |
This is one of my favorite games so I am happy to be reviewing it. SyntheticSystems ( talk) 22:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
requires an understanding of the game to comprehend and many of the transitions are weak,could you show prose that you found egregious in this regard? I'd noted myself that those who had never played Lego games may have a tough time understanding characters and such. Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 00:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Mebigrouxboy Done. SyntheticSystems ( talk) 15:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
The Lego theme is aready established.What is this in reference to? I have a similar issue with
Maybe add in the platform stuff there and then talk about Metacritic and individual reviews?Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 19:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ZooBlazer ( talk · contribs) 04:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this one since your last review stalled. Don't want you having to wait forever to get this fully reviewed. I'll go through the article and post comments in the next day or two. -- ZooBlazer talk 04:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Reviewers noted that the final bosses- word it differently to remove "noted" and I think the article will be good to go. -- ZooBlazer talk 01:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
although released under the same name
The game, although a commercial success
solve puzzles and defeat enemies with.- remove with
Indiana Jones can use his whip to attack enemies, tie enemies up, manipulate objects, or swing from the ceiling- I'd suggest changing it to something like "Indiana Jones can use his whip to attack or tie up enemies, manipulate objects, or swing from the ceiling"
On 23 November 2009, LucasArts revealed on Twitter that it was working on- you can pebably change it to just "On 23 November 2009, LucasArts revealed that it was working on"
using assets unlocked through progression through the game- rewrite a bit so you don't use "through" so much that close together
is an 'adventure creator'- is there a reason that adventure creator doesn't use quotation marks like the other things in the article?
would offer 'a tongue-in-cheek take on all four cinematic adventures of pop culture's most iconic archaeologist'- like mentioned a little above, shouldn't you use regular quotation marks?
Ref numbers are accurate as of this revision
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk)
18:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Mebigrouxboy ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 19:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Will this game going out for PS2? Basically, my only doubt is whether it will come or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laundromatlock ( talk • contribs) 00:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Lego always release their games to all consoles (expect Lego Battles which was only for DS) and this one is no exception. 123.200.196.98 ( talk) 02:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I heard in the Lego Indiana Jones 2 offical sites said is going to come to PS2 but the other websites said that is not going to come out to PS2. I'am not quite sure whether is cancel or postphone for PS2? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.18.239 ( talk) 03:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
In the main official sites said is going to come to PS2 and I wonder whether this official sites tell wrongly or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.24.123 ( talk) 15:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
How about wait for the main official sites explain about whether can come to PS2 or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.24.123 ( talk) 15:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Few days ago, I found that the official sites said is going come to PS2 and now I found that PS2 had removed from the official sites for the unknown reason whether is cancelled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.21.50 ( talk) 15:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
That TT Games cancelled the PS2 version very unfair just like Lego Harry Potter for PS2 also cancelled. They all lie in the trailer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.133.54.119 ( talk) 15:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't the boxart image be replaced by one that doesn't have "RP" rating?
Alpheta (
talk)
01:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Done. Used the old image and put the E10+ rating from another cover and put it over the old one.
Davie247 (
talk)
09:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
It may have been promised but it doesn't actually work.
S!egfried ( talk) 08:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
There's no mention of the differing gameplay between the PSP/DS versions of the game against the PS3/Xbox360/PC version. Should a mention be made of these versions in the article, as the gameplay is vastly different between the PSP/DS versions and the mainstream versions? Ggctuk ( talk) 21:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I was looking at the "Doom Town" level gameplay videos online that I think come from the XBox version and they're nothing like the PSP version! (Lego Batman was pretty much the same across platforms) How much of this game is different on different systems? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.112.148 ( talk) 01:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
it should be added to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.75.209 ( talk) 09:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Well? Any developments on this front? Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 19:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
By no means is this article contradicting Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING right? And it is certainly not blatant promotion of a product of dubious virtue, right? -- Kku ( talk) 12:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SyntheticSystems ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The prose is decent but requires an understanding of the game to comprehend and many of the transitions are weak. |
![]() |
(b) (MoS) | No MoS violations. |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | References match up what is in the article. |
![]() |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | All statements are sourced. |
![]() |
(c) (original research) | No original research, although the author may have played the game. |
![]() |
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | No plagiarism. |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | As stated earlier, an understanding of the game is necessary to understand the article. |
![]() |
(b) (focused) | Certain sections, such as the development section, don't go into enough detail. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Neutral. |
![]() |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No edit wars. |
![]() |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | Images need alt text. |
![]() |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Image placement could be better. |
![]() |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
![]() |
Needs more improvements but is workable. |
This is one of my favorite games so I am happy to be reviewing it. SyntheticSystems ( talk) 22:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
requires an understanding of the game to comprehend and many of the transitions are weak,could you show prose that you found egregious in this regard? I'd noted myself that those who had never played Lego games may have a tough time understanding characters and such. Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 00:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Mebigrouxboy Done. SyntheticSystems ( talk) 15:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
The Lego theme is aready established.What is this in reference to? I have a similar issue with
Maybe add in the platform stuff there and then talk about Metacritic and individual reviews?Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 19:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ZooBlazer ( talk · contribs) 04:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this one since your last review stalled. Don't want you having to wait forever to get this fully reviewed. I'll go through the article and post comments in the next day or two. -- ZooBlazer talk 04:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Reviewers noted that the final bosses- word it differently to remove "noted" and I think the article will be good to go. -- ZooBlazer talk 01:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
although released under the same name
The game, although a commercial success
solve puzzles and defeat enemies with.- remove with
Indiana Jones can use his whip to attack enemies, tie enemies up, manipulate objects, or swing from the ceiling- I'd suggest changing it to something like "Indiana Jones can use his whip to attack or tie up enemies, manipulate objects, or swing from the ceiling"
On 23 November 2009, LucasArts revealed on Twitter that it was working on- you can pebably change it to just "On 23 November 2009, LucasArts revealed that it was working on"
using assets unlocked through progression through the game- rewrite a bit so you don't use "through" so much that close together
is an 'adventure creator'- is there a reason that adventure creator doesn't use quotation marks like the other things in the article?
would offer 'a tongue-in-cheek take on all four cinematic adventures of pop culture's most iconic archaeologist'- like mentioned a little above, shouldn't you use regular quotation marks?
Ref numbers are accurate as of this revision
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk)
18:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Mebigrouxboy ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 19:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.