This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I don't have time to do a proper edit to fix the problems with this article, but I work in the field of educational technology, and LTI is definitely a noteworthy enough standard to deserve a good Wikipedia page. Plenty of secondary sources in a Google Scholar search https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=learning+tools+interoperability.-- Tim J Hunt ( talk) 12:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I added the POV tag as the second sentence of the opening paragraph 'By linking content and resources to learning platforms, it has made the digital education revolution possible and accessible by many students on many platforms at many institutions.' is an unsubstantiated claim about the value of the technology. It reads like an advertisement, but I didn't want to remove it completely, as I don't know if that's OK. Ortonomy ( talk) 09:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I don't have time to do a proper edit to fix the problems with this article, but I work in the field of educational technology, and LTI is definitely a noteworthy enough standard to deserve a good Wikipedia page. Plenty of secondary sources in a Google Scholar search https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=learning+tools+interoperability.-- Tim J Hunt ( talk) 12:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I added the POV tag as the second sentence of the opening paragraph 'By linking content and resources to learning platforms, it has made the digital education revolution possible and accessible by many students on many platforms at many institutions.' is an unsubstantiated claim about the value of the technology. It reads like an advertisement, but I didn't want to remove it completely, as I don't know if that's OK. Ortonomy ( talk) 09:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)